Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Saralabhai vs Rajani

Saralabhai vs Rajani

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 31, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1473837

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/1212/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Saralabhai

Respondent

Rajani

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque & the honourable mrs. justice sophy thomas tuesday, the 31st day of may 2022 / 10th jyaishta, 1944 mat.appeal no. 1212 of 2016 against the judgment in op 465/2014 of family court, nedumangadappellant/s: 1 saralabhai aged 62 years w/o sukumaranasari, chittazha pulari, vettinadu muri, vattapara village, nedumangadu taluk thiruvananthapuram 2 shabu aged 36 years, s/o. sukumaranasari chittazha pulari, vettinadu muri, vattapara village, nedumangadu taluk thiruvananthapuram by advs. sri.shammi vijayan sri.ayyappan sankar smt.k.p.santhi respondent/s: 1 rajani aged 33 years d/o. janardhanan ashari, chithrasala, nariyapuram po., vallikkode village, kozhemchery taluk, pathanamthitta district. 2 abhinav aged 2 years, s/o. shyju (minor),rep. by mother rajani, chithrasala, nariyapuram po., vallikkode village, kozhemchery taluk pathanamthitta district.by advs. benraj k. r r.s.rejitha(k/773/2007) this matrimonial appeal having being finally heard on 31.05.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: ------------------------------------------ mat. appeal no.1212/2016 ------------------------------------------j u d g m e n tdated this the 31st day of may, 2022a.muhamed mustaque, j.the parties, pending this appeal resolved their disputes. a compromise petition has been filed along with i.a.no.1/2022. we record the compromise and dispose of this appeal. therefore, in supersession of the impugned judgment, the compromise decree will bind the parties. the compromise petition filed along with i.a.no.1/2022 will form part of this judgment. inter locutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. sd/- sd/- a.muhamed mustaque, judge sd/- sophy thomas, judge ms -:3:- -:4:- -:5:- -:6:-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2022 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1944 MAT.APPEAL NO. 1212 OF 2016 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP 465/2014 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD

APPELLANT/S: 1 SARALABHAI AGED 62 YEARS W/O SUKUMARANASARI, CHITTAZHA PULARI, VETTINADU MURI, VATTAPARA VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 2 SHABU AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. SUKUMARANASARI CHITTAZHA PULARI, VETTINADU MURI, VATTAPARA VILLAGE, NEDUMANGADU TALUK THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADVS. SRI.SHAMMI VIJAYAN SRI.AYYAPPAN SANKAR SMT.K.P.SANTHI RESPONDENT/S: 1 RAJANI AGED 33 YEARS D/O. JANARDHANAN ASHARI, CHITHRASALA, NARIYAPURAM PO., VALLIKKODE VILLAGE, KOZHEMCHERY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. 2 ABHINAV AGED 2 YEARS, S/O. SHYJU (MINOR),REP. BY MOTHER RAJANI, CHITHRASALA, NARIYAPURAM PO., VALLIKKODE VILLAGE, KOZHEMCHERY TALUK PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS. Benraj K. R R.S.REJITHA(K/773/2007) THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEING FINALLY HEARD ON 31.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ------------------------------------------ Mat. Appeal No.1212/2016 ------------------------------------------

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 31st day of May, 2022

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.

The parties, pending this appeal resolved their disputes. A compromise petition has been filed along with I.A.No.1/2022. We record the compromise and dispose of this appeal. Therefore, in supersession of the impugned judgment, the compromise decree will bind the parties. The compromise petition filed along with I.A.No.1/2022 will form part of this judgment. Inter locutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE Sd/- SOPHY THOMAS, JUDGE ms -:3:- -:4:- -:5:- -:6:-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial