Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anbukumar Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Anbukumar vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 25, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1473751

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/10582/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anbukumar

Respondent

State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 25-06-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice c. saravanan in anbukumar, s/o.ramu, sadasiva vattam, sunnambu pallam, vaniyambadi taluk, ..petitioner/appellant/ a1 vs state represented by the inspector of police, (crime no.126 of 2013) ..respondent / respondent / complainant prayer: criminal miscellaneous petition filed under section 5 of limitation act praying to condone the delay of 186 days in preferring this appeal against the judgment dated 09.10.2025 made in s.c.no.51 of 2024 on the file of the session division of tirupathur district. for petitioner(s): mr.c.s.saravanan for respondent(s): mr.m.mohamed riyaz, government advocate(criminal side) page1 of 4orderthe criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner / appellant/a1 seeking to condone the delay of 186 days in preferring this appeal against the judgment dated 09.10.2025 made in s.c.no.51 of 2024 on the file of the session division of tirupathur district.2. heard the learned counsel for petitioner / appellant / accused no.13. mr.m.mohamed riyaz, learned government advocate (criminal side) for the respondent has no serious objection in allowing this petition.4. being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no av note: registry is directed to number the criminal appeal, if it is otherwise inorder.page2 of 4 to1. the session division of tirupathur district.2. the inspector of police,3. the public prosecutor, high court, madras. page3 of 4c.saravanan, j.av in page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN in Anbukumar, S/o.Ramu, Sadasiva Vattam, Sunnambu Pallam, Vaniyambadi Taluk, ..Petitioner/Appellant/ A1 Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.126 of 2013) ..Respondent / Respondent / Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 186 days in preferring this Appeal against the Judgment dated 09.10.2025 made in S.C.No.51 of 2024 on the file of the Session Division of Tirupathur District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.S.Saravanan For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Government Advocate(Criminal Side) Page1 of 4

ORDER

The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the Petitioner / Appellant/A1 seeking to condone the delay of 186 days in preferring this Appeal against the Judgment dated 09.10.2025 made in S.C.No.51 of 2024 on the file of the Session Division of Tirupathur District.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for Petitioner / Appellant / Accused No.1

3. Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent has no serious objection in allowing this Petition.

4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Petition, the delay stands condoned and the Petition is ordered. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No av Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in

order.

Page2 of 4 To

1. The Session Division of Tirupathur District.

2. The Inspector of Police,

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page3 of 4

C.SARAVANAN, J.

av in Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial