G.MAGESH KUMAR Vs The Tahsildar

G.Magesh Kumar vs The Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 15, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1472713

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1472713
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
Decided On: Jun 15, 2026
Case Number: WP/22508/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

G.Magesh Kumar

Respondent

The Tahsildar

Excerpt

.....petitioner would submit that in this case,the petitioner filed a representation dated 10.06.2026 before the respondent, requesting for transfer of patta in favour of the petitioner. however, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. hence, this petition.5. in reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 4 weeks and hence, he requests this court to pass appropriate orders.6. heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.7. in view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits ofthe matter, this court directs the respondent to consider the representation of the page2 of 4 petitioner dated 10.06.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.8. with the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. no cost. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no nsa to page3 of 4 krishnan ramasamy j. nsa page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15-06-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY G.Magesh Kumar S/o Gowtham Chand Residing at Old No 2 New No 66 Arakonam Road, ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent / Tahsildar, Tiruttani Taluk Thiruvallur District to consider and dispose of the petitioners Patta Transfer Applciation bearing No 2026 / 0105 / 01 / 034973 dated 10.06.2026 in respect of the property comprised in Survey No 301/ 8A measuring an extent of 1,320 sq.Ft., situated at Tiruttani Town Panchayat, Tiruttani Taluk, Thiruvlalur District, on the basis of the Registered Sale Deed dated 21.01.1998
For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Neeraj For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt's Cl.

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.06.2026. Page1 of 4

2. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case,

the petitioner filed a representation dated 10.06.2026 before the respondent, requesting for transfer of patta in favour of the petitioner. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.

5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 4 weeks and hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of

the matter, this Court directs the respondent to consider the representation of the Page2 of 4 petitioner dated 10.06.2026 and after issuing notice to all the concerned parties, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To Page3 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties G.Magesh Kumar vs The Tahsildar Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy