Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rehan Sait Vs State rep.by

Rehan Sait vs State rep.by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 22, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1472269

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP Crl./1376/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rehan Sait

Respondent

State rep.by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 22.06.2026coram :the hon’ble mr.justice g.k.ilanthiraiyan rehan sait .. petitionerversus1. state rep by the commissioner of police,2. the inspector of police,chennai - 600 002. .. respondents prayer : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india seeking a writ of mandamus, seeking direction towards the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of the petitioner’s compliant, dated 10.04.2026 within a stipulated time frame by giving opportunity to the petitioner. for petitioners : mr.w.camyles gandhi for respondents : mr.r.ganesh kumar, counsel for government of tamil nadu (criminal side)orderlearned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition. he has made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.2. accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. index : yes/nospeaking order/non-speaking orderneutral citation : yes/no grs to1. the public prosecutor, high court of madras.2. the commissioner of police,3. the inspector of police, chennai - 600 002.g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.grs

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.06.2026

CORAM :

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Rehan Sait .. Petitioner

Versus

1. State rep by The Commissioner of Police,

2. The Inspector of Police,

Chennai - 600 002. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, seeking direction towards the respondents 1 and 2 to dispose of the petitioner’s compliant, dated 10.04.2026 within a stipulated time frame by giving opportunity to the petitioner. For Petitioners : Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side)

ORDER

Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Index : yes/no

Speaking order/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To

1. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

2. The Commissioner of Police,

3. The Inspector of Police, Chennai - 600 002.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

grs

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial