Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Thomas vs Peter

Thomas vs PETER

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 11, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1470424

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
FAO (RO)/138/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thomas

Respondent

PETER

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan tuesday, the 11th day of january 2022 / 21st pousha, 1943 against the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2011 in os 322/2010 of munsiff court, chalakudy against the judgment and decree dated 11.03.2014 in as 215/2011 of principal sub court,irinjalakuda appellant/respondent/defendant/counter claim petitioner: thomas,aged 69, s/o.poovathussery irumban mathew, poovathussery desom, kallur thekumury village, mukundapuram taluk. by adv sri.g.sreekumar (chelur) respondent/appellant/plaintiff/respondent in the counter claim: 1 peter (died) s/o.kachapilly poulo, mukundapuram taluk, 680001. addl.2 lali peter, w/o.late peter, aged 61, kachapilly house,poovathussery desom, addl.3 resmi peter, d/o.late peter, addl.4 pratap peter, addl.5 richard peter, the legal heirs of the deceased sole respondent are impleaded as additional respondents 2 to 5 vide order dated 20/2/2015 in i.a.227/2015. addl. r2 to r5 by adv sri.r.ramadas this first appeal from order - remand order having come up for hearing on 11.01.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe matter is settled out of court and as such, the appeal is not pressed into service. a memo to that effect is also filed. hence, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed based on the settlement arrived at by the parties. sd/- p.somarajan judge spv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 21ST POUSHA, 1943 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.10.2011 IN OS 322/2010 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHALAKUDY AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.03.2014 IN AS 215/2011 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT/COUNTER CLAIM PETITIONER: THOMAS,AGED 69, S/O.POOVATHUSSERY IRUMBAN MATHEW, POOVATHUSSERY DESOM, KALLUR THEKUMURY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. BY ADV SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT IN THE COUNTER CLAIM: 1 PETER (DIED) S/O.KACHAPILLY POULO, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, 680001. ADDL.2 LALI PETER, W/O.LATE PETER, AGED 61, KACHAPILLY HOUSE,POOVATHUSSERY DESOM, ADDL.3 RESMI PETER, D/O.LATE PETER, ADDL.4 PRATAP PETER, ADDL.5 RICHARD PETER, THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE DECEASED SOLE RESPONDENT ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5 VIDE ORDER DATED 20/2/2015 IN I.A.227/2015. ADDL. R2 to R5 BY ADV SRI.R.RAMADAS THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER - REMAND ORDER HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 11.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The matter is settled out of court and as such, the appeal is not pressed into service. A memo to that effect is also filed. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed based on the settlement arrived at by the parties. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE SPV

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial