Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Manager, vs Regional Joint Labour Commissioner,

The Manager, vs Regional Joint Labour Commissioner,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 27, 2022
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1467153

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/9162/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Manager,

Respondent

Regional Joint Labour Commissioner,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice amit rawal friday, the 27th day of may 2022 / 6th jyaishta, 1944 wp(c) no. 9162 of 2021 petitioner: the manager, kuppakayam estate, trvancore rubber and tea company limited, kuppakayam p.o. 686 513, mundakayam. by advs. abraham joseph markos sri.isaac thomas sri.p.g.chandapillai abraham shri.alexander joseph markos respondents: 1 regional joint labour commissioner, appellate authority, civil station, kakkanad, ernakulam 682 030. 2 sisily, c.r. no. 15, chennappara a division, travancore rubber and tea limited, kuppakayam estate, kuppakayam p.o. 686 513, mundakayam.sri.justin jacob, sr.government pleader this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 27.05.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no.9162/2021judgmentlearned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this court for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. writ petition is incomplete in as much as the copy of the documents, part of the record of the controlling authority andorder of the controlling authority, could not be traced out. it ispermitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. sd/- amit rawal judge csl

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 9162 OF 2021 PETITIONER: THE MANAGER, KUPPAKAYAM ESTATE, TRVANCORE RUBBER AND TEA COMPANY LIMITED, KUPPAKAYAM P.O. 686 513, MUNDAKAYAM. BY ADVS. ABRAHAM JOSEPH MARKOS SRI.ISAAC THOMAS SRI.P.G.CHANDAPILLAI ABRAHAM SHRI.ALEXANDER JOSEPH MARKOS RESPONDENTS: 1 REGIONAL JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER, APPELLATE AUTHORITY, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM 682 030. 2 SISILY, C.R. NO. 15, CHENNAPPARA A DIVISION, TRAVANCORE RUBBER AND TEA LIMITED, KUPPAKAYAM ESTATE, KUPPAKAYAM P.O. 686 513, MUNDAKAYAM.

SRI.JUSTIN JACOB, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No.9162/2021

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to file afresh. Writ Petition is incomplete in as much as the copy of the documents, part of the record of the controlling authority and

order of the Controlling Authority, could not be traced out. It is

permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE csl

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial