Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 9TH BHADRA, 1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTAS 147/2016 OF III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM OS 373/2011 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT / COMMERCIAL COURT, KOLLAM
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: SUNDARESAN AGED 62 YEARS S/O. KUNJAN, CHANDINI, PARTHONA, KAVALAYUR,MANABOOR, THIRUVANANTHAURAM-695 144 BY ADV BIJU .C. ABRAHAM RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: SHEEBA KRISHNAN AGED 42 YEARS W/O. RADHAKRISHNAN, THRIVENI, PUTHENKULAM P.O., POOTHAKULAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM-691 302 BY ADVS. SAJEEV DEVARAJAN RAJESH CHAKYAT THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 31st day of August, 2022 The above Regular Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree in A.S. No.147/2016 on the files of Additional District Judge, Kollam which arise out of judgment and decree in O.S. No.373/2011 on the files of Principal Sub Court, Kollam.
2. When the matter came up before this Court,
the learned counsel appearing for both sides submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties. A compromise petition has been filed as IA No. 2/2022 along with the memorandum of agreement. Memorandum of agreement has also been produced stipulating the terms of settlement. On going through the terms of agreement executed between the parties, I am satisfied that terms of agreement are legal and proper. Hence, agreement executed between the parties produced along with compromise petition is hereby recorded. Hence, RSA is disposed of in terms with the compromise. I.A. No. the decree. The appellant is entitled for refund of court fee paid in this appeal. M.R. ANITHA JUDGE LU