Senthil Kumar Vs The District Collector

Senthil Kumar vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided May 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1465114

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1465114
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice G. R. Swaminathan,Honourable Mr.Justice V. Lakshminarayanan
Decided On: May 27, 2026
Case Number: WP/20625/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Senthil Kumar

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....respondent in his proceedings in na.ka.vi3/4233152/2026 dated 09.02.2026 and 10.02.2026 consequently directing the third respondent to issue separate patta to the petitioners based on possession of their respective properties in respect of t.s.no.76, old s.no.103, ward no.e, block no.7, situated at virudhachalam town & taluk, cuddalore district, by considering their representation dated 28.04.2026. for petitioners : mr.d.baskarfor respondents : mr.m.guruprasad counsel for government of tamil nadu ***** page2 of 4order(made by g.r.swaminathan j.) w.m.p.no.22184 of 2026 filed seeking permission to the petitioners to file a single writ petition is ordered, subject to payment of separate court fee.2. heard both sides.3. the petitioners’ appeals filed under section 10 of the landencroachment act, 1905, were dismissed by the district collector, cuddalore district, on 09.02.2026 and 10.02.2026. the petitioners have a remedy of revision against such orders. if the petitioners file such a revision within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the same shall be entertained on merits and as per law. this writ petition is disposed of accordingly. we have not gone into the merits of the matter. no costs. consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [g.r.s., j.] [v.l.n., j.] index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no page3 of 4g.r.swaminathan, j.andv.lakshminarayanan, j.to page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27-05-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.Nos.22184 & 22186 of 2026
1. Senthil Kumar S/o.Raghavan
2. Venkatesan S/o.Pramasivam
3. Karthikraja S/o.Karunanidhi
4. Akbersha S/o.Majith
5. Shagul Hammed S/o.Muhammed Haneefa
6. Annadurai S/o.Rajagopal
7. Venkatesan
8. D.Ashok Kumar S/o.Durai
9. Anbazhagan

S/o.Murugaiyyan 10.Kolanjinathan 11.Mogan Page1 of 4 12.Indirani W/o.Paramasivam 13.Jeyakumar S/o.Balakrishnan 14.Vijayalakshmi D/o.Paramasivam 15.Jalal S/o.Muhammed Kasim ..Petitioners Vs

..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records and quash the impugned orders passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.Vi3/4233152/2026 dated 09.02.2026 and 10.02.2026 consequently directing the third respondent to issue separate patta to the petitioners based on possession of their respective properties in respect of T.S.No.76, Old S.No.103, Ward No.E, Block No.7, situated at Virudhachalam Town & Taluk, Cuddalore District, by considering their representation dated 28.04.2026. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Baskar

For Respondents : Mr.M.Guruprasad Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu ***** Page2 of 4

ORDER

(Made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) W.M.P.No.22184 of 2026 filed seeking permission to the petitioners to file a single writ petition is ordered, subject to payment of separate Court fee.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The petitioners’ appeals filed under Section 10 of the Land

Encroachment Act, 1905, were dismissed by the District Collector, Cuddalore District, on 09.02.2026 and 10.02.2026. The petitioners have a remedy of revision against such orders. If the petitioners file such a revision within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the same shall be entertained on merits and as per law. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. We have not gone into the merits of the matter. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [G.R.S., J.] [V.L.N., J.] Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No Page3 of 4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

AND

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

To Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties Senthil Kumar vs The District Collector Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice G. R. Swaminathan,Honourable Mr.Justice...