Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smitha Lawrence vs Joseph Armstrong

Smitha Lawrence vs Joseph Armstrong

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 31, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1462010

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (FC)/151/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smitha Lawrence

Respondent

Joseph Armstrong

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque & the honourable mrs. justice sophy thomas thursday, the 31st day of march 2022 / 10th chaithra, 1944 against mc 35/2019 of family court, palakkadpetitioners: 1 smitha lawrence, aged 40 years w/o joseph armstrong, vadukkoot house, kaikuthuparambu, noorani, palakkad-4. 2 julies sancia, aged 16 years minor), d/o joseph armstrong, rep by mother/guardian smitha, vadukkoot house, kaikuthuparambu, noorani, palakkad-4. by adv sheeja p.d. respondent: joseph armstrong, aged 48 years s/o mohimainadhan, ssi 650, suramangalam police station, near salem railway station, salem, tamilnadu-636 005. this op (family court) having come up for admission on 31.03.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:j u d g m e n ta.muhamed mustaque, j.this original petition was filed for expeditious consideration of i.a.no.2 of 2022 filed by the petitioners before the family court, palakkad in m.c.no.35 of 2019, which is pending before the said court.2. we had directed the family court to passappropriate orders on i.a.no.2 of 2022, within a period of ten days. in view of the earlier order dated 17.03.2022, no further directions are required. this original petition is disposed of accordingly. a.muhamed mustaque, judge sophy thomas, judge as appendix of op (fc) 151/2022 petitioner's exhibits: exhibit p1 the true copy of the petition in mc no palakkad exhibit p2 the true copy of the affidavit with petition in ia no 2/2022 on the file of family court, palakkad

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 10TH CHAITHRA, 1944 AGAINST MC 35/2019 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD

PETITIONERS: 1 SMITHA LAWRENCE, AGED 40 YEARS W/O JOSEPH ARMSTRONG, VADUKKOOT HOUSE, KAIKUTHUPARAMBU, NOORANI, PALAKKAD-4. 2 JULIES SANCIA, AGED 16 YEARS MINOR), D/O JOSEPH ARMSTRONG, REP BY MOTHER/GUARDIAN SMITHA, VADUKKOOT HOUSE, KAIKUTHUPARAMBU, NOORANI, PALAKKAD-4. BY ADV SHEEJA P.D. RESPONDENT: JOSEPH ARMSTRONG, AGED 48 YEARS S/O MOHIMAINADHAN, SSI 650, SURAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, NEAR SALEM RAILWAY STATION, SALEM, TAMILNADU-636 005. THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

J U D G M E N T

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.

This original petition was filed for expeditious consideration of I.A.No.2 of 2022 filed by the petitioners before the Family Court, Palakkad in M.C.No.35 of 2019, which is pending before the said court.

2. We had directed the Family Court to pass

appropriate orders on I.A.No.2 of 2022, within a period of ten days. In view of the earlier order dated 17.03.2022, no further directions are required. This original petition is disposed of accordingly. A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE SOPHY THOMAS, JUDGE AS APPENDIX OF OP (FC) 151/2022 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN MC NO PALAKKAD EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT WITH PETITION IN IA NO 2/2022 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial