Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Girija vs Joy

Girija vs JOY

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 03, 2022
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1461584

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.Rev.Pet/510/2004

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Girija

Respondent

JOY

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath monday, the 3rd day of january 2022 / 13th pousha, 1943 crl.rev.pet no. 510 of 2004 against the judgment in sc 63/2002 of sessions court,thrissur revision petitioner: girija w/o. late changan, purassery colony, chelur, thrichur village,, arangottukara, thalappilly taluk,, thrissur district. by adv sri.t.a.rajagopalan respondents/accused/complainant:1 joy s/o.varghese, velliyamattathil house, madakkathara village, chirakkakode desom (now residing at parassery, colony, thrichur village, cheloor desom) 2 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam. by adv public prosecutor sri.sangeeth raj this criminal revision petition having been finally heard on 03.01.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: crl.r.p.no.510/2004 -:2:-o r d e rdated this the 3rd day of january, 2022 in spite of repeated directions, no steps had been taken to issue notice to the 1st respondent. today, the revision petitioner or her counsel is absent. hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge rp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 13TH POUSHA, 1943 CRL.REV.PET NO. 510 OF 2004 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN SC 63/2002 OF SESSIONS COURT,THRISSUR REVISION PETITIONER: GIRIJA W/O. LATE CHANGAN, PURASSERY COLONY, CHELUR, THRICHUR VILLAGE,, ARANGOTTUKARA, THALAPPILLY TALUK,, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.T.A.RAJAGOPALAN RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED/COMPLAINANT:

1 JOY S/O.VARGHESE, VELLIYAMATTATHIL HOUSE, MADAKKATHARA VILLAGE, CHIRAKKAKODE DESOM (NOW RESIDING AT PARASSERY, COLONY, THRICHUR VILLAGE, CHELOOR DESOM) 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SANGEETH RAJ THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.R.P.No.510/2004 -:2:-

O R D E R

Dated this the 3rd day of January, 2022 In spite of repeated directions, no steps had been taken to issue notice to the 1st respondent. Today, the revision petitioner or her counsel is absent. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE Rp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial