Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Maya vs State of Kerala

MAYA vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 05, 2022
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1456967

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/1467/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MAYA

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....and before the sho also, the injured persons have reiterated that, they do not have any objection in quashing the proceedings as they have no subsisting grievance against the petitioner herein.5. going through the materials available on record, it isdiscernible that, the dispute is basically private in nature and on account of settlement arrived at between the parties, no purpose would be served if the proceedings against the petitioner hereinwere allowed to continue. in such circumstances, the chances of a successful prosecution are very bleak. therefore, i am of the view that going by the decision in gian singh v. state of punjab and another [2012(4) klt 108], this is a fit case in which the powers of this court under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure can be invoked.accordingly, this crl.m.c. is allowed. annexure ai final report in crime no.893/2021 of thadiyittaparambu police station and all further proceedings c.c.no. 1502/2021 before the judicial first class magistrate court, kakkanad as against the petitioner are hereby quashed. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a., judge dxy appendix of crl.mc 1467/2022 petitioner annexures annexure i certified copy of the final report in c.c. no.1502/2021 of judicial first class magistrate court, kakkanadu in crime no. station, ernakulam districtannexure ii original of the affidavit sworn by 2nd annexure iii original of the affidavit sworn by 3rd annexure iv original of the affidavit sworn by 4th

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1944 CRL.MC NO. 1467 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 1502/2021 OF JMFC, KAKKANAD (TEMPORARY) PETITIONER/S: MAYA AGED 38 YEARS WIFE OF JIBI, MAADAPPILLI HOUSE, AASANPADI,NEAR SUBRAHMANYA SWAMI TEMPLE, OORAKADU KAR KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683562 BY ADVS. DEEPAK RAJ ANISH PAUL RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 MATHAI AGED 75 YEARS SON OF MATHEW, MADAPPILLIL HOUSE,AASANPADI,PAZHANGANAD KARA, KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 3 ALBIN K PAUL AGED 37 YEARS WIFE OF MATHEWS MATHAI,, MADAPPILLILHOUSE, AASANPADI, PAZHANGANAD KARA, KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 4 LEELA MATHAI AGED 70 YEARS WIFE OF MATHAI, MADAPPILLIL HOUSE, AASANPADI, PAZHANGANAD KARA, KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - BY ADVS. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR K.V.SURESH KUMAR OTHER PRESENT: Adv M P Prashanth- Sr PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J …...................................... ….......................................................... Dated this the 5th day of August, 2022

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.893/2021 of Thadiyittaparambu Police Station, which is now pending as C.C.No. 1502/2021 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kakkanad. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 324, 506 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that, on

31.10.2021 at 04:00 p.m., the petitioner attacked the respondents 2 to 4 and caused injuries to them. Annexure I is the Final Report submitted by the police and this Crl.M.C is filed for quashing all further proceedings pursuant thereto.

3. Heard Sri. Deepak Raj, the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioner, Sri. M.P. Prashanth, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and Sri. K.V.Suresh Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 4.

4. The prayer for quashing the above proceedings is

sought for by the petitioner on the ground that, the dispute between the parties has been settled and to substantiate the same, the injured persons have sworn Annexure II to Annexure IV affidavits respectively. The aforesaid affidavits indicate that, the matter has been settled and the injured persons have no subsisting grievance against the petitioner herein. They also

conveyed that they have no objection in quashing the proceedings against the petitioner herein. The learned counsel for the respondents 2 to 4 also confirmed the same. The learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions submitted that the veracity of the settlement was verified by the Station House officer concerned and before the SHO also, the injured persons have reiterated that, they do not have any objection in quashing the proceedings as they have no subsisting grievance against the petitioner herein.

5. Going through the materials available on record, it is

discernible that, the dispute is basically private in nature and on account of settlement arrived at between the parties, no purpose would be served if the proceedings against the petitioner herein

were allowed to continue. In such circumstances, the chances of a successful prosecution are very bleak. Therefore, I am of the view that going by the decision in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [2012(4) KLT 108], this is a fit case in which the powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be invoked.

Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is allowed. Annexure AI Final Report in Crime No.893/2021 of Thadiyittaparambu Police Station and all further proceedings C.C.No. 1502/2021 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kakkanad as against the petitioner are hereby quashed. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JUDGE Dxy APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 1467/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure I CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN C.C. NO.1502/2021 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KAKKANADU IN CRIME NO. STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT

Annexure II                  ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY 2ND
Annexure III                 ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY 3RD
Annexure IV                  ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY 4TH

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial