Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bharathi Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Bharathi vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1451748

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/8102/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bharathi

Respondent

The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Excerpt

.....7(c) and permit the petitioners to report before the saidapet police station for a further period of two weeks, instead of (c) the petitioners shall stay at chennai and report before the inspector of police, saidapet police station, chennai, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks, and thereafter report before the respondent police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of another two weeks, and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. for petitioners : mr.praveen s purohit for respondent : mr.p.dhileepan, government advocate (crl.side)orderthis petition has been filed to modify the condition imposed on the petitioners by an order dated 26.03.2026 in crl.o.p.no.7742 of 2026, to stay at chennai and report before the inspector of police, saidapet police station, chennai, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks, and thereafter report before the respondent police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of another two weeks, and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.2. heard both sides.3. considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearingfor the petitioners, the condition imposed as against the petitioners is modified to the effect that the petitioners shall report before the inspector of police, saidapet police station, chennai, daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks, and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. the other conditions shall remain unaltered.4. accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. cda to 1.the inspector of police, 2.the inspector of police, saidapet police station, chennai. 3.the public prosecutor, high court, madras.g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.cda

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.04.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN 1.Bharathi 2.Usha 3.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioners Vs. The State rep. By The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.45 of 2026) ... Respondent

PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying to modify the condition 7(c) and permit the petitioners to report before the Saidapet Police Station for a further period of two weeks, instead of (c) the petitioners shall stay at Chennai and report before the Inspector of Police, Saidapet Police Station, Chennai, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks, and thereafter report before the respondent police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of another two weeks, and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. For Petitioners : Mr.Praveen S Purohit For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed to modify the condition imposed on the petitioners by an order dated 26.03.2026 in Crl.O.P.No.7742 of 2026, to stay at Chennai and report before the Inspector of Police, Saidapet Police Station, Chennai, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks, and thereafter report before the respondent police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of another two weeks, and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

2. Heard both sides.

3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel appearing

for the petitioners, the condition imposed as against the petitioners is modified to the effect that the petitioners shall report before the Inspector of Police, Saidapet Police Station, Chennai, daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks, and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. The other conditions shall remain unaltered.

4. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. cda To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Inspector of Police, Saidapet Police Station, Chennai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

cda

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial