S.Gnanamoorthy vs the Union of India

S.Gnanamoorthy vs The Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 30, 2026

~4 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1451110

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1451110
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable the Chief Justice,Honourable Mr.Justice G.Arul Murugan
Decided On: Apr 30, 2026
Case Number: WP/17669/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.Gnanamoorthy

Respondent

The Union of India

Excerpt

.....to cast his vote through post for the bagur assembly constituency, puducherry prior to the date of declaration of election results of puducherry being 4.5.2026. for petitioner: mr.s.a.secular for respondents: mr.niranjan rajagopalan standing counselorder(order of the court was made by the hon'ble chief justice) this writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india seeks a direction to respondent no.5 to permit the petitioner to cast his vote through post for bagur assembly constituency, puducherry prior to the declaration of election results on 4.5.2026.2. the grievance of the petitioner is that he met with an accidentand was bedridden. due to his health condition, the petitioner expressed his interest to cast his vote from home/through post for puducherry assembly elections, 2026, scheduled on 9.4.2026. in this regard, the petitioner has also submitted a representation on 20.3.2026 to the respondents requesting to provide him opportunity to cast vote from home or through post. on the date of voting though the petitioner received a phone call from the fifth respondent and a woman officer on election duty informed him that the assistant election officer would visit his house to enable the petitioner cast vote, no one turned up in spite of long wait. immediately, the petitioner contacted the office of the fifth respondent and he was informed that a vehicle would be arranged to take him to election booth to enable him to cast vote. though the petitioner waited for long, no one turned up and, finally, the petitioner was not able to cast his vote and not able to discharge his democratic duty. after election also, the petitioner submitted a representation on 13.4.2026 to respondents 3 to 5 to permit him to cast vote from home through post and the said representation did not evoke any response till date. hence, the writ petition.3. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is the dutyof the election commission of india to have effective.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.04.2026
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.No.18990 of 2026 S.Gnanamoorthy S/o.Shanmugam No.37, Ambedkar Illam Bagurpet, Bagur Post Puducherry-607 407 Petitioner Vs 1.The Union Of India Rep. by its secretary to Government 2.The Chief Election Commissioner Ashoka Road, 3.The Chief Electoral Officer
4.The District Election Officer cum District Collector and Returning Officer Reddiyar-palayam Puducherry-605001 5.The Returning Officer (RO) Bagur Assembly Constituency Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent 5 to permit the petitioner to cast his vote through post for the Bagur Assembly Constituency, Puducherry prior to the date of declaration of election results of Puducherry being 4.5.2026. For Petitioner: Mr.S.A.Secular For Respondents: Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan Standing Counsel

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to respondent No.5 to permit the petitioner to cast his vote through post for Bagur Assembly Constituency, Puducherry prior to the declaration of election results on 4.5.2026.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he met with an accident

and was bedridden. Due to his health condition, the petitioner expressed his interest to cast his vote from home/through post for Puducherry Assembly Elections, 2026, scheduled on 9.4.2026. In this regard, the petitioner has also submitted a representation on 20.3.2026 to the respondents requesting to provide him opportunity to cast vote from home or through post. On the date of voting though the petitioner received a phone call from the fifth respondent and a woman officer on election duty informed him that the Assistant Election Officer would visit his house to enable the petitioner cast vote, no one turned up in spite of long wait. Immediately, the petitioner contacted the office of the fifth respondent and he was informed that a vehicle would be arranged to take him to election booth to enable him to cast vote. Though the petitioner waited for long, no one turned up and, finally, the petitioner was not able to cast his vote and not able to discharge his democratic duty. After election also, the petitioner submitted a representation on 13.4.2026 to respondents 3 to 5 to permit him to cast vote from home through post and the said representation did not evoke any response till date. Hence, the writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is the duty

of the Election Commission of India to have effective control over the election officers/returning officers in order to provide opportunity to all eligible voters to cast their votes in order to ensure healthy democracy. Further, the motto of the Election Commission of India and the Constitution of India and the Supreme Court of India is to allow as many citizens as possible to take part in the election process. However, in the case at hand, despite the petitioner’s best efforts to cast his vote, he was not able to discharge his democratic duty. He added that since the counting is scheduled to be held on 4.5.2026, the petitioner may be permitted to cast his vote through post.

4. Though the petitioner claims to have sent a request to the

authorities prior to election and asserts that he received a phone call asking him to wait, there is nothing on record to prove the same. The petitioner has not even chosen to file an acknowledgment of the representation sent by him. The representation sent subsequent to the polling date is also without any acknowledgment.

5. The election for the entire Assembly Constituencies in the Union Territory of Puducherry was held on 9.4.2026 and the declaration of results is scheduled on 4.5.2026. Once the election is

over, exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, no relief, much less the prayer as sought by the petitioner in this writ petition, can be granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 30.04.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr To: 1.The Secretary to Government Union of India 2.The Chief Election Commissioner Ashoka Road, 3.The Chief Electoral Officer 4.The District Election Officer cum District Collector and Returning Officer Reddiyar-palayam Puducherry-605001 5.The Returning Officer (RO) Bagur Assembly Constituency THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND

G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.

bbr 30.04.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties S.Gnanamoorthy vs The Union of India Same Judge Honourable the Chief Justice,Honourable Mr.Justice G.Arul Mur...