Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shithin, vs State of Kerala,

Shithin, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 27, 2022
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1450726

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/1202/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shithin,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

crl.mc no. 1202 of 2020 1in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath thursday, the 27th day of january 2022 / 7th magha, 1943 crl.mc no. 1202 of 2020 crime no.61/2016 of ollur police station, thrissur in cc 1880/2016 of judicial magistrate of first class - iii, thrissur petitioners/accused: 1 shithin, aged 25 years mandhamangalam, thrissur dt. 2 shimin, aged 23 years mandhamangalam,thrissur dt. by adv m.r.reena respondents/de facto complainant: 1 state of kerala, rep by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam - 682 031. 2 dhanisha, d/o.joseph, aged 22, cheeradiyil house, kolamkund desom, peechi village, thrissur dt. - 680 003. by smt.t.v.neema - sr.public prosecutor this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 27.01.2022, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.mc no. 1202 of 2020 2o r d e rthe learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed to withdraw the crl.m.c. in view of the memo, this crl.m.c is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge ab

Full Judgment

CRL.MC NO. 1202 OF 2020 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 7TH MAGHA, 1943 CRL.MC NO. 1202 OF 2020 CRIME NO.61/2016 OF Ollur Police Station, Thrissur IN CC 1880/2016 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - III, THRISSUR PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: 1 SHITHIN, AGED 25 YEARS MANDHAMANGALAM, THRISSUR DT. 2 SHIMIN, AGED 23 YEARS MANDHAMANGALAM,THRISSUR DT. BY ADV M.R.REENA RESPONDENTS/DE FACTO COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. 2 DHANISHA, D/O.JOSEPH, AGED 22, CHEERADIYIL HOUSE, KOLAMKUND DESOM, PEECHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DT. - 680 003. BY SMT.T.V.NEEMA - SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.MC NO. 1202 OF 2020 2

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo has been filed to withdraw the Crl.M.C. In view of the memo, this Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE ab

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial