Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

R. Gopakumar vs State of Kerala

R. Gopakumar vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 28, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1448949

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/855/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R. Gopakumar

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....anti corruption bureau, special investigation unit-ii, thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. other present: sri.k.p satheesan(sr.) spl.gp sri.a rajesh this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 28.02.2022, the court on the same day passed the following:orderrespondent has filed a detailed statement giving the details of investigation and the materials that have been gathered in the course of investigation. it seems that the investigation is progressing. however, having considered the fact that the crime is of the year 2014, i am inclined to direct the investigating agency to expedite the entire proceedings and to bring the proceedings to the logical conclusion at the earliest. regarding the allegations made and the materials gathered, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned special government pleader for the vigilance, i feel that it will be worthwhile to permit the petitioner to raise all the above contentions and to challenge the final report, if so advised. reserving it, i am inclined to close the crl.m.c without making any comments on the merits of materials gathered. accordingly, crl.m.c is closed. sd/- sunil thomas, judge r.av appendix of crl.mc 855/2022 petitioner annexures: annexure-i certified copy of the f.i.r. registered by the 2nd respondent dated 27-12-2014 in vc 3/14/siu-ii . annexure-ii true copy of the reply given by the geologist to the petitioner dated 7-9- 2015 under right to information act. annexure-iii true copy of the certificate issued by the village officer, pallichal dated 19-03-2012. annexure-iv true copy of the judgment dated 2-11- 2015 in w.p.(c)no. 32207/2015. annexure-v true copy of the judgment 25-04-2017 in w.p.(c)no. 610/2017 and connected writ petitions

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL THOMAS MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 9TH PHALGUNA, 1943 (AGAINST THE PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME NO.VC.3/14/SIU II PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF ENQUIRY COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL JUDGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM) PETITIONER/5TH ACCUSED: R. GOPAKUMAR AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.RAGHAVAN NAIR, RETIRED SENIOR GEOLOGIST, RESIDING AT HARI KRISHNA, AYYAPPANKAVU NAGAR, KILIMANOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 601. BY ADVS. P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) K.SUDHINKUMAR S.K.ADHITHYAN SABU PULLAN GOKUL D. SUDHAKARAN RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 031. 2 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, SPECIAL INVESTIGATION UNIT-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. OTHER PRESENT: SRI.K.P SATHEESAN(SR.) SPL.GP SRI.A RAJESH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Respondent has filed a detailed statement giving the details of investigation and the materials that have been gathered in the course of investigation. It seems that the investigation is progressing. However, having considered the fact that the crime is of the year 2014, I am inclined to direct the investigating agency to expedite the entire proceedings and to bring the proceedings to the logical conclusion at the earliest. Regarding the allegations made and the materials gathered, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the Vigilance, I feel that it will be worthwhile to permit the petitioner to raise all the above contentions and to challenge the final report, if so advised. Reserving it, I am inclined to close the Crl.M.C without making any comments on the merits of materials gathered. Accordingly, Crl.M.C is closed. sd/- SUNIL THOMAS, JUDGE R.AV APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 855/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES: Annexure-I CERTIFIED COPY OF THE F.I.R. REGISTERED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27-12-2014 IN VC 3/14/SIU-II . Annexure-II TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE GEOLOGIST TO THE PETITIONER DATED 7-9- 2015 UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT. Annexure-III TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLICHAL DATED 19-03-2012. Annexure-IV TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 2-11- 2015 IN W.P.(C)NO. 32207/2015. Annexure-V TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT 25-04-2017 IN W.P.(C)NO. 610/2017 AND CONNECTED WRIT PETITIONS

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial