B.JAYAKUMAR Vs The Managing Director

B.Jayakumar vs The Managing Director

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 28, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1447958

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1447958
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose
Decided On: Apr 28, 2026
Case Number: WP/16062/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

B.Jayakumar

Respondent

The Managing Director

Excerpt

.....dated 10.10.2023 issued by the housing and urban development department.3.mr.a.m.ravindranath jayapal, learned standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. no prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the petitioner’s representations as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, in the light of g.o.(ms.)no.136 dated 10.10.2023 issued by the housing and urban development department, within a time frame to be fixed by this court. this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representations.page2 of 44.for the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representations dated 16.07.2025 and 29.08.2025, seeking for issuance of no objection certificate in the light of the g.o.(ms.)no.136 dated 10.10.2023 issued by the housing and urban development department, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. however, there shall be no order as to costs.index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no gsa to chennai 600 035 page3 of 4abdul quddhose, j.gsa page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE B.Jayakumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 035. ..Respondent(s)
PRAYER - This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to give No Objection certificate and transfer the patta of the land to the petitioner, for reserving and acquiring the land by the Respondent situated at Survey no 23/1 and old field bearing No 87/1 based on the payment of scrutiny fee dated 16.07.2025 and by considering the petitioner’s representations dated 16.07.2025 and 29.08.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.I.Calvin Jones For Respondent(s): Mr.A.M.Ravindranath Jayapal

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to issue No Objection certificate in favour of the petitioner and thereafter, transfer the patta in the name of the petitioner for the property morefully disclosed in the prayer Page1 of 4 to this Writ Petition, based on the petitioner’s representations dated 16.07.2025 and 29.08.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.According to the petitioner, the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition has not been acquired from the petitioner within a period of five years and therefore, G.O.(Ms.)No.136 dated 10.10.2023 issued by the Housing and Urban Development Department applies to the case of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner seeks for release of the petitioner’s land from land acquisition. The petitioner, therefore had submitted representations dated 16.07.2025 and 29.08.2025 to the respondent requesting them to issue No Objection certificate in the light of G.O.(Ms.)No.136 dated 10.10.2023 issued by the Housing and Urban Development Department.

3.Mr.A.M.Ravindranath Jayapal, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. No prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the petitioner’s representations as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, in the light of G.O.(Ms.)No.136 dated 10.10.2023 issued by the Housing and Urban Development Department, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representations.

Page2 of 4

4.For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representations dated 16.07.2025 and 29.08.2025, seeking for issuance of No Objection certificate in the light of the G.O.(Ms.)No.136 dated 10.10.2023 issued by the Housing and Urban Development Department, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No GSA To Chennai 600 035 Page3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

GSA Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties B.Jayakumar vs The Managing Director Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose