Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vanaja vs Muralidharan

Vanaja vs Muralidharan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 03, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1447910

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Tr.P(C)/86/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vanaja

Respondent

Muralidharan

Excerpt

.....longer res-integra, in view of the categoric declaration of law by the hon'ble supreme court in sumitha sing v. kumar sanjay and another [(2001)10 scc 41)], mona aresh goel v. aresh satya goel [(2000) 9 scc 255], vaishali shridhar jagtap v. shridhar vishwanath jagtap [air 2016 sc 3584] and santhini v. vijaya venkatesh [2017 (4) klt 415 (sc)].the hon'ble supreme court has held that it is the convenience of the woman and children that has to be looked into, while ordering the transfer of a case from one court to another.5. in the light of the uncontroverted averments in thetransfer petition, the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the petitioner has two daughters and they are residing at pattambi, and the law laid down by the hon'ble supreme court in the afore-cited decisions, i am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this court under section 24 of the code of civil procedure.in the result, i allow the transfer petition by ordering transfer of o.p.no.1001/2021 from the family court,palakkad to the family court, ottappalam. the registry shall forward a copy of this judgment to the family court, palakkad with instructions to forthwith transmit the records in annexure-1 to the family court, ottappalam. the family court, ottappalam shall, immediately on receipt of the records in o.p.no.1001/2021, issue notice to the parties for their appearance.sd/- c.s.dias, judge rkc/03.06.22 appendix of tr.p(c) 86/2022 petitioner annexures annexure 1 photo copy of the petition filed in o.p.no.1001/2021, on the file of the family court,palakakd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 13TH JYAISHTA, 1944 IN OP 1001/2021 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKD PETITIONER/S: VANAJA AGED 41 YEARS DAUGHTER OF MURALIDHARAN, VANAJA VILLA, DURGA NAGAR, PERUMUDIYOOR POST, PATTAMBI TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 679303 BY ADV R.SREEHARI RESPONDENT/S: MURALIDHARAN AGED 55 YEARS SON OF SIVASANKARAN NAIR, KANNATH VEETTIL, MUDAPALLUR AMSOM DESOM AND POST, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678705 BY ADV V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL) THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The transfer petition is filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking to transfer O.P.No.1001/2021 (Annexure-1) from the Family Court, Palakkad to the Family Court, Ottappalam.

2. The petitioner's case, in brief, in the memorandum

of transfer petition is that; she is the wife of the respondent. They have two daughters born in their wedlock, who are aged 13 and 5 years. The respondent has filed Annexure-1, seeking a decree for divorce. The petitioner and children would find difficult to travel from Pattambi to Palakkad to contest Annexure-1, as there is no person to chaperone them. On the other hand, it would be easy for the respondent to travel to the Family Court, Ottappalam. Hence, the transfer petition.

3. Heard; the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

4. The law with respect to transfer of proceedings,

particularly matrimonial disputes, is no longer res-integra, in view of the categoric declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sumitha Sing V. Kumar Sanjay and another [(2001)10 SCC 41)], Mona Aresh Goel V. Aresh Satya Goel [(2000) 9 SCC 255], Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap V. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap [AIR 2016 SC 3584] and Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh [2017 (4) KLT 415 (SC)].

The Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that it is the convenience of the woman and children that has to be looked into, while ordering the transfer of a case from one Court to another.

5. In the light of the uncontroverted averments in the

transfer petition, the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the petitioner has two daughters and they are residing at Pattambi, and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the afore-cited decisions, I am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this Court under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

In the result, I allow the transfer petition by ordering transfer of O.P.No.1001/2021 from the Family Court,

Palakkad to the Family Court, Ottappalam. The Registry shall forward a copy of this judgment to the Family Court, Palakkad with instructions to forthwith transmit the records in Annexure-1 to the Family Court, Ottappalam. The Family Court, Ottappalam shall, immediately on receipt of the records in O.P.No.1001/2021, issue notice to the parties for their appearance.

Sd/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rkc/03.06.22 APPENDIX OF TR.P(C) 86/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure 1 PHOTO COPY OF THE PETITION FILED IN O.P.NO.1001/2021, ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT,PALAKAKD

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial