Manoj Kumar Vs The State Rep By Its,

Manoj Kumar vs The State Rep By Its,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1447691

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1447691
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
Decided On: Apr 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL MP/7779/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Kumar

Respondent

The State Rep By Its,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 30.04.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice g.k.ilanthiraiyan manoj kumar ... petitioner vs. the state of tamil nadu rep. by the inspector of police, (crime no.16 of 2026) ... respondent prayer: criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed under section 528 of bnss, 2023, praying to relax the condition in para no.7(b) that the petitioner shall stay at madurai and signed before c4, othakkadai police station, madurai, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders, imposed in crl.o.p.no.6844 of 2026 dated 17.03.2026. for petitioner : mr.n.ponraj for respondent : mr.p.dhileepan, government advocate (crl.side)orderthis application has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in crl.o.p.no.6844 of 2026 on 17.03.2026, to stay at madurai and signed before the c4, othakkadai police station, madurai, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.2. the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner is complying with the conditions regularly.3. considering the said submission, the condition imposed as against the petitioner is totally relaxed. however, the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. 30.04.2026 cda to 1.the inspector of police, 2.the public prosecutor, high court, madras.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.04.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Manoj Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. By The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.16 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying to relax the condition in para No.7(b) that the petitioner shall stay at Madurai and signed before C4, Othakkadai Police Station, Madurai, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders, imposed in Crl.O.P.no.6844 of 2026 dated 17.03.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ponraj For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This application has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.6844 of 2026 on 17.03.2026, to stay at Madurai and signed before the C4, Othakkadai Police Station, Madurai, daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner is complying with the conditions regularly.

3. Considering the said submission, the condition imposed as against the petitioner is totally relaxed. However, the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation. 30.04.2026 cda To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Manoj Kumar vs The State Rep By Its, Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan