Andi.K vs the District Collector

ANDI.K vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Apr 28, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1445901

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1445901
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose
Decided On: Apr 28, 2026
Case Number: WP/16221/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ANDI.K

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....the same has not been considered, the petitioner had filed this writ petition.3.mr.vadivelu deenadayalan, learned additional government pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law by giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by thispage2 of 4 court. this court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.4.for the foregoing reasons, this court directs the 1 st respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s request for payment of compensation for the well, alleged to have been located in the agricultural lands which were earlier acquired by the respondents after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. however, there shall be no order as to costs.index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no gsa to page3 of 4abdul quddhose, j.gsa page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28-04-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Andi.K ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)
PRAYER - This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to sanction the compensation and award amount to the well consist of 130 feet depth, situated in the petitioners acquired agricultural lands in S.No. 343/3B extent of 1500 sq.ft. situated at Solai Kottai Village, Naikanahalli, Dharmapuri Taluk, Dharmapuri District by considering the representation dated 25.03.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Chandrasekaran For Respondent(s): Mr.Vadivelu Deenadayalan Additional Government Pleader
Page1 of 4

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to sanction the compensation and award the amount to the petitioner in respect to the Well consisting of 130 feet depth, situated in the petitioner’s acquired agricultural lands morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition, based on the petitioner’s representation dated 25.03.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2.According to the petitioner, though the compensation amount was paid to the petitioner for the agricultural lands acquired from the petitioner by the respondents, the respondents failed to pay compensation for the Well consisting of 130 feet depth, which was situated in the agricultural lands belonging to the petitioner, which were acquired by the respondents. The petitioner had given a representation on 25.03.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered, the petitioner had filed this Writ Petition.

3.Mr.Vadivelu Deenadayalan, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law by giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this

Page2 of 4 Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation.

4.For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 1 st respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s request for payment of compensation for the Well, alleged to have been located in the agricultural lands which were earlier acquired by the respondents after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No GSA To Page3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

GSA Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties ANDI.K vs The District Collector Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose