Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arun K vs State of Kerala

ARUN K vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 02, 2022
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1445685

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./691/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ARUN K

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....that no earlier ndps cases have been reported against the petitioner. however, it isb.a.no.691/2022 3 submitted that the petitioner is a regular trouble maker and is included in the rowdy history list of perinthalmanna police station.7. having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case andconsidering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for 55 days and also considering the fact that his continued detention is not necessary for the purposes of any investigation as a final report has already been filed in the matter, i am of the view that the petitioner can be granted bail subject to conditions.8. in the result this bail application is allowed. it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:-(i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;(ii) the petitioner shall report before the investigating officer in crime no. until further orders;(iii) the petitioner shall not interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate any witness in crime no. 28/2022 of perinthalmanna police station;(iv) the petitioner shall surrender his passport before the jurisdictional court. if the petitioner does not have a passport, he shall execute an affidavit to that effect and file the same before the jurisdictional court b.a.no.691/2022 4 within seven days of release on bail;(v) the petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail. if any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in crime no. 28/2022 of perinthalmanna police station, may file an application before the jurisdictional court for cancellation of bail.sd/- gopinath p. judge acd b.a.no.691/2022 5 appendix of bail appl. 691/2022 petitioner annexures annexure1 certified copy of the order in crl.m.p no: court for sc/st (poa) act & ndps act cases, manjeri

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 691 OF 2022 CRIME NO.28 OF 2022 OF PERINTHALMANNA POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ARUN K AGED 25 YEARS KAVUNGAL HOUSE PUTHENANGADI P O PARIYAPURAM MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679321 BY ADV SOJAN MICHEAL RESPONDENT/: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OTHER PRESENT: SRI. NOUSHAD K.A. (SR.PP) THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A.No.691/2022 2

ORDER

This is an application for regular bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.28/2022 of Perinthalmanna Police Station, alleging the offence punishable under Section 22(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that on 7.1.2022, he was found in possession of 1.252 grams of MDMA meant for the purposes of sale.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner is absolutely innocent in the mater. It is submitted that the drug in question was not recovered from the petitioner and that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. It is submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 7.1.2022 and he has completed 55 days in custody. It is submitted that the continued detention of the petitioner is not necessary as a final report has already been filed in the matter.

5. I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor also.

6. The learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the grant of

bail. It is submitted that the petitioner has criminal antecedents including a case registered alleging commission of offence under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code. On a specific question as to whether the petitioner was earlier involved in any NDPS case, the learned Public Prosecutor submits that no earlier NDPS cases have been reported against the petitioner. However, it is

B.A.No.691/2022 3 submitted that the petitioner is a regular trouble maker and is included in the Rowdy History List of Perinthalmanna Police Station.

7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for 55 days and also considering the fact that his continued detention is not necessary for the purposes of any investigation as a final report has already been filed in the matter, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted bail subject to conditions.

8. In the result this bail application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall report before the Investigating officer in Crime No. until further orders;

(iii) The petitioner shall not interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate any witness in Crime No. 28/2022 of Perinthalmanna Police Station;

(iv) The petitioner shall surrender his passport before the jurisdictional Court. If the petitioner does not have a passport, he shall execute an affidavit to that effect and file the same before the jurisdictional court B.A.No.691/2022 4 within seven days of release on bail;

(v) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail. If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the Investigating officer in Crime No. 28/2022 of Perinthalmanna Police Station, may file an application before the jurisdictional Court for cancellation of bail.

sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE acd B.A.No.691/2022 5 APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 691/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P NO: COURT FOR SC/ST (POA) ACT & NDPS ACT CASES, MANJERI

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial