Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sibi Joy vs State of Kerala

Sibi Joy vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 03, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1445061

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./626/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sibi Joy

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....the record and it is submitted that the petitioner is accused of having committed a serious offence and is not entitled to be released on bail. however, it is submitted that no criminal antecedents are reported against the petitioner.5. having regard to the facts and circumstances of the caseand considering the fact that the petitioner would be entitled to statutory bail on completion of 60 days in custody (if final report is not filed) and considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for 56 days, i am of the opinion that the petitioner can be granted bail subject to conditions. i also note that the learned public prosecutor upon instructions, submitted that the filing of the final report will take some more time as the chemical analysis report is not yet received.6. in the result this bail application is allowed. it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:-(i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;(ii) the petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in crime no.16/2022 of info park police station as and when called upon to do so.(iii) the petitioner shall not attempt to interfere with the investigation, influence or intimidate any witness in crime no.16/2022 of info park police station;(iv) the petitioner shall not involve in any other crimewhile on bail. if any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in crime no.16/2022 of info park police station may file an application before the jurisdictional court for cancellation of bail. sd/- gopinath p. judge aj appendix of bail appl. 626/2022 petitioner annexures annexure1 true copy of first information report in crime no. 16/2022 of info park police station annexure2 true copy of the seizure mahazar in crime no. 16/2022 of info park police station,

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 12TH PHALGUNA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 626 OF 2022 PETITIONER: SIBI JOY AGED 23 YEARS SON OF JOY, KALAPPURAKKAL HOUSE, THAINURI BHAGAM, CHITTOOR P.O, EDAYAKUNNAM, CHERANALLOOR. ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682027

BY ADVS. P.MOHAMED SABAH SAIPOOJA LIBIN STANLEY SADIK ISMAYIL M.MAHIN HAMZA RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER INFO PARK POLICE STATION, KAKKANAD ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682042 BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. T.R. RENJITH (SR. PP) THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.16/2022 of Info Park Police Station alleging commission of offences under Sections 22(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that, the petitioner was found in possession of 3.410 grams of MDMA and thereby he committed the offences alleged against him.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is absolutely innocent in the matter. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the matter and that there was no recovery of contraband from the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner has been in custody from 07.01.2022 and has completed 56 days in custody as on date. It is submitted that since the final report has not been filed in the matter, the petitioner is entitled to statutory bail on completion of 60 days in custody.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the

grant of bail. The circumstances appearing against the petitioner are pointed out from the record and it is submitted that the petitioner is accused of having committed a serious offence and is not entitled to be released on bail. However, it is submitted that no criminal antecedents are reported against the petitioner.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case

and considering the fact that the petitioner would be entitled to statutory bail on completion of 60 days in custody (if final report is not filed) and considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for 56 days, I am of the opinion that the petitioner can be granted bail subject to conditions. I also note that the learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions, submitted that the filing of the final report will take some more time as the chemical analysis report is not yet received.

6. In the result this bail application is allowed. It is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.16/2022 of Info Park Police Station as and when called upon to do so.

(iii) The petitioner shall not attempt to interfere with the investigation, influence or intimidate any witness in Crime No.16/2022 of Info Park Police Station;

(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime

while on bail. If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the Investigating officer in Crime No.16/2022 of Info Park Police Station may file an application before the jurisdictional Court for cancellation of bail. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE AJ APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 626/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure1 TRUE COPY OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO. 16/2022 OF INFO PARK POLICE STATION Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR IN CRIME NO. 16/2022 OF INFO PARK POLICE STATION,

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial