Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ambika vs Rajan

Ambika vs RAJAN

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 28, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1445057

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/151/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ambika

Respondent

RAJAN

Excerpt

.....a direction to the learned munsiff, ponnani to consider ia no.1378 of 2019 and e.p.no.80 of 2019 pending before that court at the earliest, at any rate, within three months from the date of production or receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/- a.badharudeen, judge rkj ..3.. appendix of op(c) 151/2022 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the judgment in original suit no.328 of 2015 dated 10th day of exhibit p2 true copy of the decree in original suit no. 328 of 2015 dated 10th day of exhibit p3 true copy of the execution petitionno. 80 of 2019 in original suit no. 328 of 2015 filed by the petitioners before the munsiff court, magistrate exhibit p4 the true copy of the auction advertisement order in execution petition no. 80 of 2019 in original suit no. 328 of 2015 issued by the munsiff magistrate court ponnani. exhibit p5 true copy of the petition to recallthe sale proclamation and to adjourn the auction and the complaint against rule 66 notice filed by the respondent before the munsiff magistrate court, ponnani in execution petition no. 80 of 2019. exhibit p6 true copy of the complaint filed by the petitioners to dismiss the respondents exhibit p5 complaints. exhibit p7 the true copy of the order in execution application no. 243 of 2019 in execution petition no. 80 of 2019 ..4.. in original suit no. 328 of 2015 dated 9th day of december 2019 issued by the munsiff magistrate court, ponnani. exhibit p8 the true copy of the diary extract in execution petition no. 80 of 2019 in original suit no. 328 of 2015.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1944 OP(C) NO. 151 OF 2022

ORDER IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.243/2019 IN EXECUTION

PETITION NO.80/2019 OF THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT,PONNANI PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.243/2019/PETITIONERS IN EXECUTION PETITION 80/2019: 1 AMBIKA AGED 50 YEARS W/O. KONNAMKALATHU VEETTIL, KANNAN, KONNAMKALATHU VEETTIL PONNANI TALUK, EDAPPAL AMSOM, THUYYAM DESOM, P.O 2 KANNAN, AGED 57 YEARS S/O. KONNAMKALATHU VEETTIL, SANKUNNI, KONNAMKALATHU VEETTIL, PONNANI TALUK, EDAPPAL AMSOM, THUYYAM DESOM P.O BY ADV K.LATHA RESPONDENT/APPELLANT IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.243/2019/RESPONDENT IN EXECUTION PETITION 80/2019: RAJAN AGED 45 YEARS S/O. THOTTEKKATTU BHARGAVI, THOTTEKKATTU, PONNANI TALUK, EDAPPAL AMSOM, THUYYAM DESOM P.O EDAPPAL 679 576. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2.. ---------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT

In this original petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek early disposal of IA No.1378 of 2019 and E.P.No.80 of 2019. The learned Munsiff, Ponnani, as per report dated 31.01.2022, expressed his willingness to dispose of the same without further delay. However, the learned Munsiff not exactly pointed out the time for disposal. Having considered the minimum prayer, I am inclined to allow this original petition. Therefore, there shall be a direction to the learned Munsiff, Ponnani to consider IA No.1378 of 2019 and E.P.No.80 of 2019 pending before that Court at the earliest, at any rate, within three months from the date of production or receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- A.BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE rkj ..3.. APPENDIX OF OP(C) 151/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.328 OF 2015 DATED 10TH DAY OF Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 328 OF 2015 DATED 10TH DAY OF Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION

NO. 80 OF 2019 IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 328 OF 2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT, MAGISTRATE Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AUCTION ADVERTISEMENT ORDER IN EXECUTION PETITION NO. 80 OF 2019 IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 328 OF 2015 ISSUED BY THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT PONNANI. Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION TO RECALL

THE SALE PROCLAMATION AND TO ADJOURN THE AUCTION AND THE COMPLAINT AGAINST RULE 66 NOTICE FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, PONNANI IN EXECUTION PETITION NO. 80 OF 2019. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS TO DISMISS THE RESPONDENTS EXHIBIT P5 COMPLAINTS. Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 243 OF 2019 IN EXECUTION PETITION NO. 80 OF 2019 ..4.. IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 328 OF 2015 DATED 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 ISSUED BY THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, PONNANI. Exhibit P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DIARY EXTRACT IN EXECUTION PETITION NO. 80 OF 2019 IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 328 OF 2015.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial