Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dan Philip Mathew vs Dr.V.Venu

Dan Philip Mathew vs Dr.V.Venu

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 07, 2022
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1444921

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/152/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dan Philip Mathew

Respondent

Dr.V.Venu

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice murali purushothaman monday, the 7th day of march 2022 / 16th phalguna, 1943 con.case(c) no. 152 of 2022 against the order/judgment dated 05.11.2021 in wp(c) 16516/2021 of high court of kerala petitioner/petitioner: dan philip mathew aged 26 years s/o. late k.p. mathew, kochkizhakethil house, pramadam, mallassery p. o., pathanamthitta - 689 646. by adv sri. george sebastian respondent/1st respondent: dr.v.venu age and father's name not known to the petitioner, presently working as principal secretary to government, higher education department, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. sri. c. n. prabhakaran - gp this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 07.03.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentit is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that annexure - a judgment has been complied with. this is recorded. therefore, the contempt of court case is closed. sd/- murali purushothaman judge spr appendix petitioner's annexures:- annexure a a certified copy of the judgment dated 05.11.2021 in wp(c) no.16516/2021. annexure b a true copy of the ad card dated 12.11.2021 issued to 1st respondent. respondent's annexures: nil.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1943 CON.CASE(C) NO. 152 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 05.11.2021 IN WP(C) 16516/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER: DAN PHILIP MATHEW AGED 26 YEARS S/O. LATE K.P. MATHEW, KOCHKIZHAKETHIL HOUSE, PRAMADAM, MALLASSERY P. O., PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 646. BY ADV SRI. GEORGE SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT: DR.V.VENU AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. SRI. C. N. PRABHAKARAN - GP THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Annexure - A judgment has been complied with. This is recorded. Therefore, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SPR APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE A A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.11.2021 IN WP(C) NO.16516/2021. ANNEXURE B A TRUE COPY OF THE AD CARD DATED 12.11.2021 ISSUED TO 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial