Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jithin P.S. vs State of Kerala

Jithin P.S. vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 01, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1444293

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(Crl.)/68/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jithin P.S.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....wp(crl.) no.68 of 2022 ------------------------------------- dated this the 1st day of february, 2022j u d g m e n tjayachandran, j.the petitioner, who claims to have an intense relationship with the alleged detenue, seeks issuance of a writ of habeas corpus directing production of the alleged detenue before this court, on the premise that she is under illegal detention of her father, the fourth respondent herein. according to the petitioner, the fourth respondent is harassing the alleged detenue, physically and mentally, and she somehow managed to contact the petitioner to inform that she is forced to marry someone else.2. as per order dated 20.1.2022, we directedthe third respondent/s.h.o. to obtain a statement of the alleged detenue by a woman police officer, without the presence of parents or any other family member. such statement is taken and is produced before us, along with a report, wherein the alleged detenue would state, unequivocally, that she is not under any illegal detention and that she is residing with her parents out of her free will. the petitioner is causing nuisance to the alleged detenue, wherefore, they have shifted their residence from kottappady to mammiyoor. inasmuch as the alleged detenue has expressed clearly that she is not interested to go along with the petitioner and that she is not under any illegal detention, this writ petition lacks merit and the same is, therefore, dismissed. k.vinod chandran c.jayachandran jg appendix of wp(crl.) 68/2022 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the complaint filed by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent dated 06/01/2022. exhibit p2 true copy of the receipt dated complaint.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 12TH MAGHA, 1943 WP(CRL.) NO. 68 OF 2022 PETITIONER/S: JITHIN P.S. AGED 23 YEARS S/O.SUBRAN P.P., PAKKATH HOUSE, KOTTAPPADI P.O., THRISSUR - 680 505. BY ADV V.A.VINOD RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2 DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR - 680 003. 3 STATION HOUSE OFFICER GURUVAYOOR POLICE STATION, THRISSUR - 680 101. 4 SIMON VADUKOOT HOUSE, KOTTAPPADI, THRISSUR - 680 505. BY ADV ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA OTHER PRESENT: SRI.E.C.BINEESH, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.VINOD CHANDRAN & C.JAYACHANDRAN, JJ. ------------------------------------ WP(Crl.) No.68 of 2022 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 1st day of February, 2022

J U D G M E N T

Jayachandran, J.

The petitioner, who claims to have an intense relationship with the alleged detenue, seeks issuance of a writ of habeas corpus directing production of the alleged detenue before this Court, on the premise that she is under illegal detention of her father, the fourth respondent herein. According to the petitioner, the fourth respondent is harassing the alleged detenue, physically and mentally, and she somehow managed to contact the petitioner to inform that she is forced to marry someone else.

2. As per Order dated 20.1.2022, we directed

the third respondent/S.H.O. to obtain a statement of the alleged detenue by a woman police officer, without the presence of parents or any other family member. Such statement is taken and is produced before us, along with a report, wherein the alleged detenue would state, unequivocally, that she is not under any illegal detention and that she is residing with her parents out of her free will. The petitioner is causing nuisance to the alleged detenue, wherefore, they have shifted their residence from Kottappady to Mammiyoor. Inasmuch as the alleged detenue has expressed clearly that she is not interested to go along with the petitioner and that she is not under any illegal detention, this writ petition lacks merit and the same is, therefore, dismissed. K.VINOD CHANDRAN C.JAYACHANDRAN jg APPENDIX OF WP(CRL.) 68/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 06/01/2022. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED COMPLAINT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial