Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pradeep vs State of Kerala

Pradeep vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 03, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1443598

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A/58/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pradeep

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....xxx pp smt.sheeba thomas this criminal appeal having come up for admission on 03.02.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthis appeal is directed against an order passed by additional court of sessions for trial of cases relating to atrocities and sexual violence against women and children, thiruvananthapuram in crl.m.p. no.1544/2021 arising from crime no.1838/2021 of poovar police station.2. the petitioner is the first accused in the above crimeand as per the allegations of the prosecution, he has committed offences punishable under sections 366, 366 a, 376(2) (i) (n), 343 r/w section 34 of the indian penal code, section 4 r/w section 3(a), 6 r/w 5(i) (m), 17 r/w 16 of of protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 and section 3 (2) (v) of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) amendment act, 2015.3. the bail was declined by the court below on finding that the offences alleged are serious. the learned publicprosecutor has filed a report in the matter. it is noticed from the report that the investigation in the case is completed and a final report has been laid down before the court on 16.12.2021. considering the gravity of the offences committed against a minor girl aged 12 years, this court finds it proper to reject bail to the petitioner, though charge sheet has been filed. however, this order will not stand in the way of the petitioner filing application seeking the relief before the trial court, at a later point of time.the crl.appeal stands dismissed with the above observation. sd/- mary joseph judge al/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 14TH MAGHA, 1943 CRL.A NO. 58 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 3.1.2022 IN CRMP 1544/2021 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT FOR TRIAL OF CASES RELATING TO ATTROCITIES AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN CRIME NO.1838/2021 OF POOVAR POLICE STATION. APPELLANT/PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED: PRADEEP, AGED 25 YEARS S/O. PRINCE, DOOR NO. 4/10-20, NILAVANIVILA VEEDU, MELPALA DESOM, MANKADA VILLAGE, VILAVANCODE TALUK, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682031. 2 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT - 695121, 3 STATION HOUSE OFFICER POOVAR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695525. 4 VICTIM XXX PP SMT.SHEEBA THOMAS THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

This appeal is directed against an order passed by Additional Court of Sessions for Trial of cases relating to Atrocities and Sexual Violence against Women and Children, Thiruvananthapuram in Crl.M.P. No.1544/2021 arising from Crime No.1838/2021 of Poovar Police Station.

2. The petitioner is the first accused in the above crime

and as per the allegations of the prosecution, he has committed offences punishable under Sections 366, 366 A, 376(2) (i) (n), 343 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4 r/w Section 3(a), 6 r/w 5(i) (m), 17 r/w 16 of of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 3 (2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015.

3. The bail was declined by the court below on finding that the offences alleged are serious. The learned Public

Prosecutor has filed a report in the matter. It is noticed from the report that the investigation in the case is completed and a final report has been laid down before the court on 16.12.2021. Considering the gravity of the offences committed against a minor girl aged 12 years, this Court finds it proper to reject bail to the petitioner, though charge sheet has been filed. However, this order will not stand in the way of the petitioner filing application seeking the relief before the trial court, at a later point of time.

The Crl.Appeal stands dismissed with the above observation. Sd/- MARY JOSEPH JUDGE al/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial