Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M.Baskar, Vs The Special Secretary,

M.Baskar, vs The Special Secretary,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 30, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1443495

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WA/1154/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Baskar,

Respondent

The Special Secretary,

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 30.04.2026coramthe hon'ble mr.sushrut arvind dharmadhikari, chief justice and the hon'ble mr.justice g. arul murugan and cmp nos.11449, 11455 and 11458 of 2026 m.baskar .. appellant in wa 1154/2026 m.manimekalai .. appellant in wa 1155/2026 s.jayavel .. appellant in wa 1157/2026 -vs- chennai 600 008. .. respondents 1-3 in all was4. shanthi5. r.ayanar .. respondents 4 & 5 in wa no.1154/20264. s.gowri .. respondent no.4 in wa.1155/20264. s.jayanthi .. respondent no.4in wa no.1157/2026 appeals filed under clause 15 of the letters patent to set aside the impugned common order dated 22.01.2026 in w.p.nos.19568, 22383 and 22382 of 2015 on the file of this court. for appellant in all was. : mr.r.prabhakaran for respondents 1 to 3 in all was. : ms.p.veena suresh stdg. counsel *****common judgment(judgment of the court was delivered by the hon'ble chief justice) after arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave to withdraw all the three appeals. an endorsement is also made to that effect. in view of the same, all the three appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. there shall be no order as to costs. consequently, the interim applications stand closed. (sushrut arvind dharmadhikari, cj.) (g.arul murugan, j.) index : yes/no neutral citation : yes/no sra to the hon'ble chief justice andg. arul murugan, j.(sra)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.04.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN and CMP Nos.11449, 11455 and 11458 of 2026 M.Baskar .. Appellant in WA 1154/2026 M.Manimekalai .. Appellant in WA 1155/2026 S.Jayavel .. Appellant in WA 1157/2026 -vs- Chennai 600 008. .. Respondents 1-3 in all WAs

4. Shanthi

5. R.Ayanar .. Respondents 4 & 5 in WA No.1154/2026

4. S.Gowri .. Respondent No.4 in WA.1155/2026

4. S.Jayanthi .. Respondent No.4

in WA No.1157/2026 Appeals filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the Impugned Common Order dated 22.01.2026 in W.P.Nos.19568, 22383 and 22382 of 2015 on the file of this Court. For Appellant in all WAs. : Mr.R.Prabhakaran For Respondents 1 to 3 in all WAs. : Ms.P.Veena Suresh Stdg. Counsel *****

COMMON JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave to withdraw all the three appeals. An endorsement is also made to that effect. In view of the same, all the three appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim applications stand closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sra To THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND

G. ARUL MURUGAN, J.

(sra)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial