Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Biju Joseph vs Jain Joseph

Biju Joseph vs Jain Joseph

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Sep 15, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1443389

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
AR/14/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Biju Joseph

Respondent

Jain Joseph

Excerpt

.....palarivattom - 682 025. 3 sijo jacob thaliayath aged 42 years s/o.jacob thaliyath, "thaliyath house", mallussery, vattaparambu p.o., ernakulam - 683 579, partner of neo media school llp, a limited liability partnership having its registered address at 39/2287, janatha junction, palarivattom - 682 025.by advs. k.s.bharathan alphin antony aadithyan s.mannali visakh antony abel antony christine mathew rance r. respondents: 1 jain joseph, aged 55 years, s/o.joseph, designated partner of neo media school llp, residing at flat no.601, national puzhayoram, desom p.o., aluva, kerala, pin - 683 102. -:2:- 2 deena jain aged 45 years w/o.jain joseph, partner of neo media school llp, residing at padathiparambil house, ollur p.o., thrissure, kerala, pin - 680 306. this arbitration request having come up for admission on 15.09.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: -:3:- dated this the 15th day of september,2022orderthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the subject matter in dispute has been settled between the parties. hence, the petitioners are no longer desirous of prosecuting the arbitration request.2. the said submission is recorded. the arbitration request is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- c.s.dias,judge dst/15.09.22 //true copy/ p.a.to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 24TH BHADRA, 1944 AR NO. 14 OF 2022 PETITIONERS: 1 BIJU JOSEPH S/O.JOSEPH MADATHIKUNNEL PAIL, RESIDENT OF LIGUORI BHAVAN, CSSR PROVINCIAL HOUSE, MARROTTICHOODU, KALADI P.O., MATTOOR - 683 574, AUTHORISED SIGNATORY AND DESIGNATED PARTER OF NEO MEDIA SCHOOL LLP, A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP HAVING ITS REGISTERED ADDRESS AT 39/2287, JANATHA JUNCTION, PALARIVATTOM - 682 025. 2 POLY ANTONY S/O.ANTONY, A RESIDENT OF REDEMPTORIST COMMUNITY, PB NO.8451, KARNATAKA - 560 084, PARTNER OF NEO MEDIA SCHOOL LLP, A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP HAVING ITS REGISTERED ADDRESS AT 39/2287, JANATHA JUNCTION, PALARIVATTOM - 682 025. 3 SIJO JACOB THALIAYATH AGED 42 YEARS S/O.JACOB THALIYATH, "THALIYATH HOUSE", MALLUSSERY, VATTAPARAMBU P.O., ERNAKULAM - 683 579, PARTNER OF NEO MEDIA SCHOOL LLP, A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP HAVING ITS REGISTERED ADDRESS AT 39/2287, JANATHA JUNCTION, PALARIVATTOM - 682 025.

BY ADVS. K.S.BHARATHAN ALPHIN ANTONY AADITHYAN S.MANNALI VISAKH ANTONY ABEL ANTONY CHRISTINE MATHEW RANCE R. RESPONDENTS: 1 JAIN JOSEPH, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, DESIGNATED PARTNER OF NEO MEDIA SCHOOL LLP, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.601, NATIONAL PUZHAYORAM, DESOM P.O., ALUVA, KERALA, PIN - 683 102. -:2:- 2 DEENA JAIN AGED 45 YEARS W/O.JAIN JOSEPH, PARTNER OF NEO MEDIA SCHOOL LLP, RESIDING AT PADATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, OLLUR P.O., THRISSURE, KERALA, PIN - 680 306. THIS ARBITRATION REQUEST HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:3:- Dated this the 15th day of September,2022

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the subject matter in dispute has been settled between the parties. Hence, the petitioners are no longer desirous of prosecuting the arbitration request.

2. The said submission is recorded. The arbitration request is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE DST/15.09.22 //True copy/ P.A.To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial