Shyam S Menon vs Aravindakumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 10, 2022

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1443364

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1443364
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice V.G.Arun
Decided On: Mar 10, 2022
Case Number: RP/62/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shyam S Menon

Respondent

Aravindakumar

Excerpt

.....menon, darpan, r. madhavan nair road, pallimukku, ernakulam - 682 016. by advs. p.g.suresh aswathy krishnanrespondent/s: 1 aravindakumar aged 71 years s/o. govindalu, residing at door no.39/4844, m. g. road, ravipuram, kochi - 682 016. 2 p. b. gopalakrishnan aged 63 years s/o. raghavan pillai, pukalakattu ettukettil house, p. o. palarovattom, ernakulam, pin - 682 025. 3 bhima jewels jose junction, mg road, ernakulam, represented through its managing director, pin - 682 011. this review petition having come up for admission on 10.03.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: -2-orderdated this the 10th day of march, 2022 having heard the learned counsel on either side, i am unable to find any error apparent on the face of the judgment, requiring invocation of the power of review. needless to say, my findings are confined to the question of maintainability, based on appraisal of the factual and legal findings rendered by the executing court. if questions other than those relating to maintainability are to be canvassed, it is for the parties to agitate them before the executing court. the review petition is dismissed accordingly. sd/- v.g.arun judge scl/10.03.2022 -3- appendix of rp 62/2022 petitioner annexures annexure a1 the certified copy of the judgment in op(c) no.1951/2020 dated 20.10.2021.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 19TH PHALGUNA, 1943 RP NO. 62 OF 2022 OP(C) 1951/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER/S:
1 SHYAM S MENON AGED 55 YEARS S/O. LATE KRISHNA MENON, DARPAN, R. MADHAVAN NAIR ROAD PALLIMUKKU, ERNAKULAM - 682016., REPRESENTED THROUGH THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MRS. SUBHA GOKUL MENON, AGED 53 YEAR, D/O. LATE KRISHNA MENON, DARPAN, R. MADHAVAN NAIR ROAD, PALLIMUKKU, ERNAKULAM - 682 016. 2 SUBHA GOKUL MENON AGED 53 YEARS, D/O. LATE KRISHNA MENON, DARPAN, R. MADHAVAN NAIR ROAD, PALLIMUKKU, ERNAKULAM - 682 016. 3 SIVA GOPALAKRISHNAN AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. LATE KRISHNA MENON, DARPAN, R. MADHAVAN NAIR ROAD PALLIMUKKU, ERNAKULAM - 682016., REPRESENTED THROUGH THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MRS. SUBHA GOKUL MENON, AGED 53 YEAR, D/O. LATE KRISHNA MENON, DARPAN, R. MADHAVAN NAIR ROAD, PALLIMUKKU, ERNAKULAM - 682 016. BY ADVS. P.G.SURESH ASWATHY KRISHNAN
RESPONDENT/S: 1 ARAVINDAKUMAR AGED 71 YEARS S/O. GOVINDALU, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.39/4844, M. G. ROAD, RAVIPURAM, KOCHI - 682 016. 2 P. B. GOPALAKRISHNAN AGED 63 YEARS S/O. RAGHAVAN PILLAI, PUKALAKATTU ETTUKETTIL HOUSE, P. O. PALAROVATTOM, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 025. 3 BHIMA JEWELS JOSE JUNCTION, MG ROAD, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, PIN - 682 011. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

ORDER

Dated this the 10th day of March, 2022 Having heard the learned Counsel on either side, I am unable to find any error apparent on the face of the judgment, requiring invocation of the power of review. Needless to say, my findings are confined to the question of maintainability, based on appraisal of the factual and legal findings rendered by the executing court. If questions other than those relating to maintainability are to be canvassed, it is for the parties to agitate them before the executing court. The review petition is dismissed accordingly. Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE Scl/10.03.2022 -3- APPENDIX OF RP 62/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN OP(C) NO.1951/2020 DATED 20.10.2021.

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2022 Same Parties Shyam S Menon vs Aravindakumar Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice V.G.Arun