Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jose, vs the District Collector,

JOSE, vs The District Collector,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 25, 2022
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1443207

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/1498/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

JOSE,

Respondent

The District Collector,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice anu sivaraman friday, the 25th day of february 2022 / 6th phalguna, 1943 petitioners :- 1 jose, aged 57 years s/o. john, muringatherri house, 2 jancy, aged 52 years w/o.jose, muringatherri house, by advs. n.krishna raja mauli reni james respondents :- 1 the district collector, first floor, civil station, ayyanthole, thrissur - 680 003. 2 the revenue divisional officer, revenue divisional office, first floor, civil station, ayyanthole, thrissur - 680 003.3 the tahsildar, thrissur taluk office, opp. thrissur town hall, chembukkav, thrissur - 680 020. 4 the village officer, kolazy village office, thrissur shornur road, m.g. kavu, thrissur - 680 581. 5 the agricultural officer, kolazhy krishi bhavan, by smt.vinitha b, sr.gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 25.02.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: -: 2 :-judgmentdated this the 25th day of february, 2022 it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the writ petition has become infructuous as orders had already been passed. the said submission is recorded. the writ petition is, accordingly, closed as infructuous. sd/- anu sivaraman judge jvt/28.2.2022

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 6TH PHALGUNA, 1943 PETITIONERS :- 1 JOSE, AGED 57 YEARS S/O. JOHN, MURINGATHERRI HOUSE, 2 JANCY, AGED 52 YEARS W/O.JOSE, MURINGATHERRI HOUSE, BY ADVS. N.KRISHNA RAJA MAULI RENI JAMES RESPONDENTS :- 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, FIRST FLOOR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR - 680 003. 2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, FIRST FLOOR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR - 680 003.

3 THE TAHSILDAR, THRISSUR TALUK OFFICE, OPP. THRISSUR TOWN HALL, CHEMBUKKAV, THRISSUR - 680 020. 4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOLAZY VILLAGE OFFICE, THRISSUR SHORNUR ROAD, M.G. KAVU, THRISSUR - 680 581. 5 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KOLAZHY KRISHI BHAVAN, BY SMT.VINITHA B, SR.GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -: 2 :-

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25th day of February, 2022 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the writ petition has become infructuous as orders had already been passed. The said submission is recorded. The writ petition is, accordingly, closed as infructuous. Sd/- ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE Jvt/28.2.2022

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial