Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A.V.George vs Reshmi

A.V.George vs Reshmi

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 17, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1442987

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/96/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A.V.George

Respondent

Reshmi

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a.muhamed mustaque monday, the 17th day of october 2022 / 25th aswina, 1944 against the order/judgment in wp(c) 179/2021 of high court of kerala petitioner: a.v.george, aged 66 years, s/o.varghese, areekkad house, methala p.o., ernakulam district - 683 542. by adv p.v.elias respondent: reshmi, (age and father's name not known to the petitioner), secretary, asamannor grama panchayat, asamannoor p.o., ernakulam district - 683 549. by adv k.s.arun kumar this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 17.10.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..j u d g m e n tthe learned counsel for the panchayat submits that the third respondent in the writ petition has obtained license and consent from the kerala pollution control board to run the poultry. the said submission is recorded. if the petitioner is of the view that the 3rd respondent does not have any license or consent, the petitioner is given liberty to take up the contention in the writ petition. with liberty as above, the contempt case is closed. sd/- a.muhamed mustaque judge pr ..3.. appendix of con.case(c) 96/2022 petitioner annexures annexure a1 certified copy of the order dated hon'ble court. annexure a2 true copy of the notice dated petitioner to the respondent along with postal receipt.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 25TH ASWINA, 1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 179/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER: A.V.GEORGE, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O.VARGHESE, AREEKKAD HOUSE, METHALA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 542. BY ADV P.V.ELIAS RESPONDENT: RESHMI, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, ASAMANNOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, ASAMANNOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 549. BY ADV K.S.ARUN KUMAR THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the Panchayat submits that the third respondent in the writ petition has obtained license and consent from the Kerala Pollution Control Board to run the poultry. The said submission is recorded. If the petitioner is of the view that the 3rd respondent does not have any license or consent, the petitioner is given liberty to take up the contention in the writ petition. With liberty as above, the Contempt Case is closed. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE PR ..3.. APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 96/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED HON'BLE COURT. Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT ALONG WITH POSTAL RECEIPT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial