Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Park Residency, vs State of Kerala

Park Residency, vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jun 10, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1442975

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/1414/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Park Residency,

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice murali purushothaman friday, the 10th day of june 2022 / 20th jyaishta, 1944 wp(c) no. 1414 of 2022 petitioners:1 park residency, kodungallur, thrissur - 680 668, represented by its managing partner sunoj kurian residing at palakunnel house, athirampzuha p.o., kottayam - 686 562. 2 aswathy bar and hotel. represented by its managing partner v r sajeevan residing at panikkassery house, kodungallur, thrissur - 680 664. 3 hotel indraprestham, kodungallur, thrissur - 680 664, represented by its managing partner t b premdas residing at tharayil house, sn puram thrissur - 680 665. 4 hotel palace en paradise, represented by its proprietor c k umesh residing at challiyil house, arakulam west kodungallur, thrissur - 680 664. by advs. thomas abraham merciamma mathew aswin.p.john r.ananthapadmanaban thayyib sha p.s. paul babyrespondents: 1 state of kerala represented by its secretary, taxes department, government of kerala, secretariat, 2 commissioneer of excise, 3 deputy commissioner of excise, thrissur - 680 001. 4 district collector, thrissur, civil station, ayyanthole, thrissur - 680 003. 5 district police chief, (thrissur rural), thrissur - 680 003. 6 station house officer, kodungallur police station, thrissur - 680 307. sri. v.k sunil - gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 10.06.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- murali purushothaman judge spr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 20TH JYAISHTA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 1414 OF 2022 PETITIONERS:

1 PARK RESIDENCY, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR - 680 668, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SUNOJ KURIAN RESIDING AT PALAKUNNEL HOUSE, ATHIRAMPZUHA P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 562. 2 ASWATHY BAR AND HOTEL. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER V R SAJEEVAN RESIDING AT PANIKKASSERY HOUSE, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR - 680 664. 3 HOTEL INDRAPRESTHAM, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR - 680 664, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER T B PREMDAS RESIDING AT THARAYIL HOUSE, SN PURAM THRISSUR - 680 665. 4 HOTEL PALACE EN PARADISE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR C K UMESH RESIDING AT CHALLIYIL HOUSE, ARAKULAM WEST KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR - 680 664. BY ADVS. THOMAS ABRAHAM MERCIAMMA MATHEW ASWIN.P.JOHN R.ANANTHAPADMANABAN THAYYIB SHA P.S. PAUL BABY

RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, 2 COMMISSIONEER OF EXCISE, 3 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, THRISSUR - 680 001. 4 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR, CIVIL STATION, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR - 680 003. 5 DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF, (THRISSUR RURAL), THRISSUR - 680 003. 6 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KODUNGALLUR POLICE STATION, THRISSUR - 680 307. SRI. V.K SUNIL - GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SPR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial