Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nijo vs State of Kerala

NIJO vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 08, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1442556

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/297/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

NIJO

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....are the accused in crime no.275 of 2019 of palluruthy kasaba police station which is now pending as c.c no.515 of 2019 on the file of the judicial first class magistrate court-ii, kochi. the offences alleged against the petitioners are under sections 143, 147, 341, 323, 427, 294(b), 506(1) and 149 of indian penal code.2. the prosecution case is that on 18.2.2019 at 10.30 p.m, the accused persons formed an unlawful assembly and manhandled the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein causing injuries to them.3. annexure ai is the fir and annexure a2 is the final report. this crl.m.c is filed for quashing all further proceedings pursuant to annexure a2.4. heard sri.shinoj k.n, learned counsel for the petitioners, sri.ranjit george, learned public prosecutor for the state and smt.vidya c.v, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 and 3.5. prayer for quashing the proceedings is sought mainly onthe ground that the dispute between the parties has been settled. to substantiate the settlement, annexure-a3 and a4 affidavits sworn by the respondent nos.2 and 3 are filed with this crl.m.c. in the said affidavit, the respondents 2 and 3 have expressly acknowledged the aforesaid settlement and also conveyed their no- objection to quash the proceedings against the petitioners herein. the learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 and 3 also confirms the same.6. the allegations would reveal that the dispute is purelyprivate in nature. in such circumstances, by applying the principles laid down by the honourable supreme court in gian singh v. state of punjab and another [(2012) 10 scc 303], proceedings can be quashed by invoking the powers of this court under section 482 cr.p.c. this is particularly because, on account of the settlement, no fruitful purpose would be served by allowing the prosecution to continue.in the result, this crl.m.c. is allowed, and annexure-a1 fir in crime no.275 of 2019 of palluruthy kasaba police station, and all further proceedings in c.c no.515 of.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 515/2019 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, KOCHI PETITIONER/S:

1 NIJO AGED 35 YEARS S/O. JOHNY, KURISHINKAL HOUSE, JAVAHAR ROAD, KUMBALANGI 2 LEEN JOSEPH, AGED 23 YEARS S/O. SABU K.J., KURISHINKAL HOUSE, JAVAHAR ROAD, 3 JOHNY K.J., AGED 61 YEARS S/O. JOSEPH, KURISHINKAL HOUSE, JAVAHAR ROAD, KUMBALANGI 4 JINU, AGED 29 YEARS S/O. JOHNY, KURISHINKAL HOUSE, JAVAHAR ROAD, KUMBALANGI 5 AJITH K.A., AGED 23 YEARS S/O.HARIHARAN, KALATHIL HOUSE, SOUTH KUMBALANGI, BY ADVS. SHINOJ.K.N C.K.RAPHEEQUE K.B.NIDHINKUMAR

RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031. 2 AWEYOON NOYAL XAVIER AGED 24 YEARS S/O. JOSEPH K.X., KOCHERI HOUSE, KUMBALANGI VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682007. 3 JOSEPH ANSTEIN AGED 26 YEARS S/O. FRANCIS XAVIER, CHAKKALA PARAMBIL HOUSE, BY ADV VIDYA C.V. OTHER PRESENT: SRI RANJIT GEORGE, SR PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.275 of 2019 of Palluruthy Kasaba Police Station which is now pending as C.C No.515 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Kochi. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 143, 147, 341, 323, 427, 294(b), 506(1) and 149 of Indian Penal Code.

2. The prosecution case is that on 18.2.2019 at 10.30 p.m, the accused persons formed an unlawful assembly and manhandled the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein causing injuries to them.

3. Annexure AI is the FIR and Annexure A2 is the Final Report. This Crl.M.C is filed for quashing all further proceedings pursuant to Annexure A2.

4. Heard Sri.Shinoj K.N, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri.Ranjit George, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and Smt.Vidya C.V, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3.

5. Prayer for quashing the proceedings is sought mainly on

the ground that the dispute between the parties has been settled. To substantiate the settlement, annexure-A3 and A4 affidavits sworn by the respondent Nos.2 and 3 are filed with this Crl.M.C. In the said affidavit, the respondents 2 and 3 have expressly acknowledged the aforesaid settlement and also conveyed their no- objection to quash the proceedings against the petitioners herein. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 and 3 also confirms the same.

6. The allegations would reveal that the dispute is purely

private in nature. In such circumstances, by applying the principles laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], proceedings can be quashed by invoking the powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This is particularly because, on account of the settlement, no fruitful purpose would be served by allowing the prosecution to continue.

In the result, this Crl.M.C. is allowed, and Annexure-A1 FIR in Crime No.275 of 2019 of Palluruthy Kasaba Police Station, and all further proceedings in C.C No.515 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Kochi are hereby quashed.

Sd/- sab ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 297/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT DATED 19.2.2019 IN CRIME NO.0275/2019 OF PALLURUTHY KASABA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT DATED 28.2.2019 IN CRIME NO.0275/2019 OF PALLURUTHY KASABA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. Annexure A3 AFFIDAVIT IS SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 6.1.2022. Annexure A4 AFFIDAVIT IS SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 6.1.2022.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial