Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Saranraj vs State of Kerala

Saranraj vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 21, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1442014

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./278/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Saranraj

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....no.278 of 2022 35. learned public prosecutor taken me through thestatement given by the victim and submits that going by the statement, the offence was initially committed at a time when the victim was only 15 years of age. it is submitted that the statement given by the victim also suggests that the petitioner and the victim girl were in a relationship and that thereafter the complaint has been filed on account of the fact that the petitioner denied the relationship and started relationship with another woman.6. having regard to the facts and circumstances of the caseand considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for more than 91 days and since final report has already been filed in the matter, i am of the opinion that the petitioner can be released on bail subject to strict conditions. accordingly, this application for bail is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail subject to the following conditions:-(i) the petitioner shall execute bond for a sum of rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;(ii) petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in b.a. no.278 of 2022 4 crime no.729/2021 of vandanmedu police station on every saturday at 11 am until further orders;(iii) the petitioners shall not attempt to influence or intimidate the victim or any witness in crime no.729/2021 of vandanmedu police station;(iv) the petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail. if any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in crime no.729/2021 of vandanmedu police station may file an application before the jurisdictional court, for cancellation of bail. sd/- gopinath p. judge ajt

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 1ST MAGHA, 1943 BAIL APPL. NO. 278 OF 2022 CRIME NO.729/2021 OF VANDANMEDU POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED: SARANRAJ, AGED 28 YEARS, S/O. DURAIPANDY, 8 ACRE PUTHUVAL, DIMUKKU ESTATE, PERIYAR VILLAGE, PEERMEDU TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT PIN 685 509 BY ADVS. JOBI A. THAMPI GEM KORASON PRIYANKA SEBASTIAN

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VANDANMEDU POLICE STATION, VANDENMEDU, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685 551 BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SEETHA S., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: B.A. NO.278 OF 2022 2

ORDER

This is an application for regular bail.

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.729/2021 of

Vandanmedu police station, Idukki district, alleging commission of offences under Sections 363, 365, 30, 370A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(a) r/w.4(2), 51 r/w. 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that, pretending to be in

love with the victim girl, who is stated to be 17 years of age (on the date of registration of the First Information Report) the petitioner sexually assaulted her and also committed rape on her during the period from October 2019 till October 2021.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner and the victim girl were in love with each other. It is submitted that the complaint was given on the basis of some misunderstanding. It is submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 22.10.2021 and has completed 91 days in custody. It is submitted that the final report has already been filed in the matter and that the continued detention of the petitioner is not necessary for the purpose of any investigation.

B.A. NO.278 OF 2022 3

5. Learned Public Prosecutor taken me through the

statement given by the victim and submits that going by the statement, the offence was initially committed at a time when the victim was only 15 years of age. It is submitted that the statement given by the victim also suggests that the petitioner and the victim girl were in a relationship and that thereafter the complaint has been filed on account of the fact that the petitioner denied the relationship and started relationship with another woman.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case

and considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for more than 91 days and since final report has already been filed in the matter, I am of the opinion that the petitioner can be released on bail subject to strict conditions. Accordingly, this application for bail is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court;

(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in B.A. NO.278 OF 2022 4 Crime No.729/2021 of Vandanmedu Police station on every Saturday at 11 am until further orders;

(iii) The petitioners shall not attempt to influence or intimidate the victim or any witness in Crime No.729/2021 of Vandanmedu police station;

(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail. If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in Crime No.729/2021 of Vandanmedu police station may file an application before the jurisdictional court, for cancellation of bail. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial