Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devakumar, vs Manoj,

Devakumar, vs MANOJ,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 13, 2022
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1441723

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/52/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devakumar,

Respondent

MANOJ,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen thursday, the 13th day of january 2022 / 23rd pousha, 1943 against the order in i.a.no.07/2021 in os 288/2016 of additional munsiff court, kollam petitioner/petitioner/counter claim defendant: devakumar, aged 48 years s/o.raveendra babu, salil bhavan, keerthi nagar-63, asramom cherry, by advs. o.d.sivadas s.sunil narayanan respondent/respondent/counter claim plaintiff: manoj, aged 45 years s/o.raveendran babu, salil bhavan, keerthi nagar-63, asramam cherry, this op (civil) having come up for admission on 13.01.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: -2-judgmentit is fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise his contentions in the matter of proof of will, the subject matter in o.s.no.288/2016 as per law. accordingly, permission is granted. original petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to put his contention in the matter of genuineness of will in question in o.s.288/2016. sd/- a. badharudeen judge nkr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 23RD POUSHA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.07/2021 IN OS 288/2016 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM PETITIONER/PETITIONER/COUNTER CLAIM DEFENDANT: DEVAKUMAR, AGED 48 YEARS S/O.RAVEENDRA BABU, SALIL BHAVAN, KEERTHI NAGAR-63, ASRAMOM CHERRY, BY ADVS. O.D.SIVADAS S.SUNIL NARAYANAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COUNTER CLAIM PLAINTIFF: MANOJ, AGED 45 YEARS S/O.RAVEENDRAN BABU, SALIL BHAVAN, KEERTHI NAGAR-63, ASRAMAM CHERRY, THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

JUDGMENT

It is fairly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise his contentions in the matter of proof of will, the subject matter in O.S.No.288/2016 as per law. Accordingly, permission is granted. Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to put his contention in the matter of genuineness of will in question in O.S.288/2016. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial