Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Thomas Stephen, vs the District Collector ,

Thomas Stephen, vs The District Collector ,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 24, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1440679

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/407/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thomas Stephen,

Respondent

The District Collector ,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran thursday, the 24th day of february 2022 / 5th phalguna, 1943 petitioners: 1 thomas stephen, aged 71 years, s/o. v.g.thomas, vayalirakathu, koodal p.o., 2 saramma stephen, aged 70 years, w/o. thomas stephen, vayalirakathu, koodal p.o., by advs.liju.v.stephen indu susan jacob respondents:1 the district collector, pathanamthitta, 2nd floor, collectorate road, pathanamthitta-689 645. 2 the deputy collector (revenue), department of revenue, collectorate, pathanamthitta district-689645. 3 the special tahsildar (la), ranni, pathanamthitta district-689672. 4 the executive engineer, kstp division, ponkunnam division, pathanamthitta district-686506. 5 the tahsildar (land acquisition), konni taluk, pathanamthitta district-689691. 6 the village officer, koodal village, koodal p.o., smt.k.amminikutty sr.g.p.this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 24.02.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: -2-judgmentwhen this matter was called today, the learned senior government pleader - smt.k.amminikutty, affirmatively stated that there is no proposal to acquire any further lands from the petitioners for the purpose of the upgradation of the punalur- ponkunnam highway. recording the afore submissions and leaving liberty to the respondents, if so found necessary in future, to initiate necessary and appropriate legal measures for acquisition from the petitioners, i close this writ petition without any further orders.sd/- devan ramachandran judge akv -3- appendix of wp(c) 407/2022 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the sale deed no.3504/1970 dated 18/09/1970 of pathanapuram sro. exhibit p2 true copy of the notice dated of the land acquisition act 1894. exhibit p3 true copy of the representation dated the respondents. respondent's/s exhibits : nil. //true copy// p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1943 PETITIONERS: 1 THOMAS STEPHEN, AGED 71 YEARS, S/O. V.G.THOMAS, VAYALIRAKATHU, KOODAL P.O., 2 SARAMMA STEPHEN, AGED 70 YEARS, W/O. THOMAS STEPHEN, VAYALIRAKATHU, KOODAL P.O., BY ADVS.LIJU.V.STEPHEN INDU SUSAN JACOB RESPONDENTS:

1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PATHANAMTHITTA, 2ND FLOOR, COLLECTORATE ROAD, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645. 2 THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (REVENUE), DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689645. 3 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689672. 4 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KSTP DIVISION, PONKUNNAM DIVISION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-686506. 5 THE TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION), KONNI TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689691. 6 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOODAL VILLAGE, KOODAL P.O., SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY SR.G.P.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

JUDGMENT

When this matter was called today, the learned Senior Government Pleader - Smt.K.Amminikutty, affirmatively stated that there is no proposal to acquire any further lands from the petitioners for the purpose of the upgradation of the Punalur- Ponkunnam Highway. Recording the afore submissions and leaving liberty to the respondents, if so found necessary in future, to initiate necessary and appropriate legal measures for acquisition from the petitioners, I close this writ petition without any further orders.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE akv -3- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 407/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.3504/1970 DATED 18/09/1970 OF PATHANAPURAM SRO. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT 1894. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED THE RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS : NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial