Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Yesodha vs the Inspector General of Registration

Yesodha vs The Inspector General of Registration

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1440653

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/13703/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Yesodha

Respondent

The Inspector General of Registration

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-03-2026coramthe hon'ble mr justice abdul quddhose yesodha ..petitioner(s) vs1. the inspector general of registration 100, santhome high rd, mullima nagar, mandavelipakkam, raja annamalai puram, chennai-600 028.2. the commissioner hindu religious and charitable endowments departments, uthamar gandhi salai, nugambakkam, chennai.3. the sub registrar ashok nagar, plot no.602-b-1, 1st floor, alagirisamy salai near psbb school, k.k.ngar, chennai-600 078.4. arulmigu viyakrapureeswarar alias vengeeswarar temple, rep. by its hereditary trustee, vadapalani, chennai-26 ..respondent(s)writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india seeking for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records in rfl/ ashok nagar/ 77/ 2025 on the file of the 3rd respondent, to quash the refusal check slip dated 11.04.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent and to consequently direct the 3rd respondent herein to register the settlement deed presented by the petitioner on 11.04.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this court. for petitioner(s): mr.r.harikrishnanfor respondent(s): mr. u. baranidharan, sgp for r1 to r3 mr.d.ravichander, sgp for rr2 & 4 page1 of 2abdul quddhose, j.rkmorderthe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition. he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. recording the said endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. 27-03-2026 neutral citation: yes/no rkm page2 of 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Yesodha ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Inspector General Of Registration 100, Santhome High Rd, Mullima Nagar, Mandavelipakkam, Raja Annamalai Puram, Chennai-600 028.

2. The Commissioner Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowments Departments, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nugambakkam, Chennai.

3. The Sub Registrar Ashok Nagar, Plot No.602-b-1, 1st Floor, Alagirisamy Salai Near Psbb School, K.K.Ngar, Chennai-600 078.

4. Arulmigu Viyakrapureeswarar Alias Vengeeswarar Temple, Rep. By Its Hereditary Trustee, Vadapalani, Chennai-26 ..Respondent(s)

Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for records in RFL/ Ashok Nagar/ 77/ 2025 on the file of the 3rd respondent, to quash the refusal check slip dated 11.04.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent and to consequently direct the 3rd respondent herein to register the settlement deed presented by the petitioner on 11.04.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Harikrishnan

For Respondent(s): Mr. U. Baranidharan, SGP for R1 to R3 Mr.D.Ravichander, SGP for RR2 & 4 Page1 of 2

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

RKM

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. Recording the said endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. 27-03-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RKM Page2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial