Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sumathi, vs Sadanandan

Sumathi, vs Sadanandan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 06, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1440553

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/26/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sumathi,

Respondent

Sadanandan

Excerpt

.....same day delivered the following: o.p.(c)no.26 of 2022 ..2..a.badharudeen, j.o.p.(c)no.26 of 2022 dated this the 6th day of january, 2022judgmento.s.no.31 of 2012 on the file of the munsiff- magistrate court, south paravur, kollam sought to be disposed of by the second defendant in the above suit in which, defendants also filed counter claim. perusing the records produced along with this original petition, it appears that this is a suit of 2012. in fact, this is a suit directed to be disposed of by this court as well as the apex court as part of disposal of five years old matters. therefore, i am inclined to allow this petition without issuing notice to the other side. in the result, this original petition is allowed. therefore, there shall be a direction to the learned munsiff-magistrate court, south paravur, kollam to dispose of o.s.no.31 of 2012 within a period of three months from the date of production or receipt of a copy of this judgment. o.p.(c)no.26 of 2022 ..3.. registry is directed to forward a copy of this judgment to the learned munsiff-magistrate court, south paravur, kollam within seven days for compliance and information. sd/- a.badharudeen, judge rkj o.p.(c)no.26 of 2022 ..4.. appendix of op(c) 26/2022 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the plaint dated 03.02.2012 in o.s. no. 31/2012 of munsiff magistrate court, paravur. exhibit p2 true copy of the written statement andcounterclaim dated 12.08.2012 filed by the defendants in o.s. no. 31/2012 of the munsiff magistrate court, paravur. exhibit p3 true copy of judgment dated 15/6/2019 in o s no. 31/2012 of the musnfif magistrate court, paravur. exhibit p4 true copy of details of the proceedings in os no. 31/2012 of the munsiff magistrate court, paravur as available in the e court website.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 16TH POUSHA, 1943 OP(C) NO. 26 OF 2022 OS 31/2012 OF MUNSIFF-MAGISTRATE COURT, SOUTH PARAVOOR, KOLLAM PETITIONER/2ND DEFENDANT - 2ND COUNTER CLAIM PLAINTIFF : SUMATHI, W/O. RAVEENDRAN, VARAVILA VEEDU, ULIYANADU CHERRY, THAZHAM THEKKU, CHATHANNOOR, CHIRAKKARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM. BY ADVS. S.SANTHOSH KUMAR ANJANA.S.SANTHOSH

RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF-COUNTER CLAIM DEFENDANTS : 1 SADANANDAN 2 SARASWATHI, W/O. SADANANDNAN, THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.(C)No.26 of 2022 ..2..

A.BADHARUDEEN, J.

O.P.(C)No.26 of 2022 Dated this the 6th day of January, 2022

JUDGMENT

O.S.No.31 of 2012 on the file of the Munsiff- Magistrate Court, South Paravur, Kollam sought to be disposed of by the second defendant in the above suit in which, defendants also filed counter claim. Perusing the records produced along with this original petition, it appears that this is a suit of 2012. In fact, this is a suit directed to be disposed of by this Court as well as the Apex Court as part of disposal of five years old matters. Therefore, I am inclined to allow this petition without issuing notice to the other side. In the result, this original petition is allowed. Therefore, there shall be a direction to the learned Munsiff-Magistrate Court, South Paravur, Kollam to dispose of O.S.No.31 of 2012 within a period of three months from the date of production or receipt of a copy of this judgment. O.P.(C)No.26 of 2022 ..3.. Registry is directed to forward a copy of this judgment to the learned Munsiff-Magistrate Court, South Paravur, Kollam within seven days for compliance and information. Sd/- A.BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE rkj O.P.(C)No.26 of 2022 ..4.. APPENDIX OF OP(C) 26/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT DATED 03.02.2012 IN O.S. NO. 31/2012 OF MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVUR. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT AND

COUNTERCLAIM DATED 12.08.2012 FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS IN O.S. NO. 31/2012 OF THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVUR. Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 15/6/2019 IN O S NO. 31/2012 OF THE MUSNFIF MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVUR. Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF DETAILS OF THE PROCEEDINGS IN OS NO. 31/2012 OF THE MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE COURT, PARAVUR AS AVAILABLE IN THE E COURT WEBSITE.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial