Toney Abraham vs Nihilkumar Singh

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Oct 14, 2022

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1440454

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1440454
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Shaji P.Chaly
Decided On: Oct 14, 2022
Case Number: Con.Case(C)/9/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Toney Abraham

Respondent

Nihilkumar Singh

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice shaji p.chaly friday, the 14th day of october 2022 / 22nd aswina, 1944 con.case(c) no. 9 of 2019 against the judgmentwp(c) 22218/2018 of high court of kerala petitioner: toney abraham aged 57 years s/o. abraham, link manor, 6c, old railway station link road, ernakulam, pin-682 018 by adv v.m.krishnakumarrespondent/1st respondent: nihilkumar singh revenue divisional officer, fort kochi, pin-682 001 by sri.joby joseph, senior government pleader this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 14.10.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following: c.o(c) no.9 of 2019 2judgmentdated this the 14th day of october,2022 this contempt petition is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 04.07.2018 in w.p.(c) no.22218/2018, are not complied with.2. however, today when the matter is taken up, adv.maya.m. representing the learned counsel for petitioner sri.v.m.krishnakumar, submitted that already the directions are complied with. in that view of the matter, i do not find any reason to pursue the contempt petition any further. the contempt petition is closed accordingly.sd/- shaji p.chaly smv judge c.o(c) no.9 of 2019 3 appendix of con.case(c) 9/2019 petitioner annexures annexure i certified copy of the judgment dated 04.07.2018 in wp(c) no. 22218/2018

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 22ND ASWINA, 1944 CON.CASE(C) NO. 9 OF 2019 AGAINST THE JUDGMENTWP(C) 22218/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER: TONEY ABRAHAM AGED 57 YEARS S/O. ABRAHAM, LINK MANOR, 6C, OLD RAILWAY STATION LINK ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 018 BY ADV V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR

RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT: NIHILKUMAR SINGH REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, PIN-682 001 BY SRI.JOBY JOSEPH, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: C.O(C) No.9 of 2019 2

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 14th day of October,2022 This contempt petition is filed by the petitioner complaining that the directives contained in the judgment dated 04.07.2018 in W.P.(C) No.22218/2018, are not complied with.

2. However, today when the matter is taken up, Adv.Maya.M. representing the learned counsel for petitioner Sri.V.M.Krishnakumar, submitted that already the directions are complied with. In that view of the matter, I do not find any reason to pursue the contempt petition any further. The contempt petition is closed accordingly.

Sd/- SHAJI P.CHALY smv JUDGE C.O(C) No.9 of 2019 3 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 9/2019 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE I CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.07.2018 IN WP(C) NO. 22218/2018

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2022 Same Parties Toney Abraham vs Nihilkumar Singh Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Shaji P.Chaly