Sidhique, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 18, 2022

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1440422

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1440422
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.
Decided On: Feb 18, 2022
Case Number: Bail Appl./94/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sidhique,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice gopinath p. friday, the 18th day of february 2022 / 29th magha, 1943 petitioner: sidhique, aged 23 years s/o. basheer residing at bhagath manzil valathungal p.o, kollam 691 011. by advs. s.sreekumar (kollam) k.vijayan respondents: 1 state of kerala, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, at ernakulam-682 031 2 the station house officer, eravipuram police station, kollam district, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, at ernakulam-682 031 sri. noushad. k.a. (sr.pp) this bail application having come up for admission on 18.02.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:orderpetitioner is one among the accused in crime no.886 of 2019 of eravipuram police station, kollam district alleging commission of offences under section 143, 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 308, 149 of the ipc.2. the allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith the other accused attacked the defacto complainant and inflicted injuries on him and thereby they committed the offence alleged against them. when this matter was taken up for consideration today, it is a submission of the learned public prosecutor that an absconding charge sheet has been filed in so far as it relates to the petitioner as the petitioner had not appeared in the matter.3. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working abroad and this was the sole reason why the petitioner could not appear.4. considering the above, i deem it appropriate to disposeof this bail application directing that if the petitioner surrenders before the jurisdictional court on or before 26.02.2022, any bail application filed by him shall be considered and disposed of on the same day having regard to the judgment of the supreme court in aman preet singh v. cbi through director; [2021(6)khc 54].sd/- gopinath p. judge aj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 29TH MAGHA, 1943 PETITIONER: SIDHIQUE, AGED 23 YEARS S/O. BASHEER RESIDING AT BHAGATH MANZIL VALATHUNGAL P.O, KOLLAM 691 011. BY ADVS. S.SREEKUMAR (KOLLAM) K.VIJAYAN RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, AT ERNAKULAM-682 031 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, AT ERNAKULAM-682 031 SRI. NOUSHAD. K.A. (SR.PP) THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Petitioner is one among the accused in Crime No.886 of 2019 of Eravipuram Police Station, Kollam district alleging commission of offences under Section 143, 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 308, 149 of the IPC.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he along

with the other accused attacked the defacto complainant and inflicted injuries on him and thereby they committed the offence alleged against them. When this matter was taken up for consideration today, it is a submission of the learned Public Prosecutor that an absconding charge sheet has been filed in so far as it relates to the petitioner as the petitioner had not appeared in the matter.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working abroad and this was the sole reason why the petitioner could not appear.

4. Considering the above, I deem it appropriate to dispose

of this bail application directing that if the petitioner surrenders before the jurisdictional court on or before 26.02.2022, any bail application filed by him shall be considered and disposed of on the same day having regard to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Aman Preet Singh V. CBI through Director; [2021(6)KHC 54].

Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE AJ

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2022 Same Parties Sidhique, vs State of Kerala, Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.