Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manikandan vs the Manager

Manikandan vs The Manager

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 06, 2022
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1440364

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/286/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manikandan

Respondent

The Manager

Excerpt

.....the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the overdue amount in '6' instalments and thereafter, if the amount so directed is repaid within the time as directed above, to have the loan account regularised.6. accordingly, there will be a direction to therespondent-bank to accept repayment of the entire overdue amount of rs.6,00,000/- along with bank charges from the petitioner and to regularise the loan account of the petitioner on the following conditions:(i) the overdue amount of rs.6,00,000/- shall be repaid in '6' equated monthly instalments.(ii) the first instalment shall be paid on or before 31.01.2022.(iii) petitioner shall continue to pay the regular emi’s along with the instalments directed above.(iv) in the event of any default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with law.(v) in order to enable the petitioner to repay the-4- entire amounts, all coercive proceedings against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. the writ petition is disposed of as above. sd/- bechu kurian thomas judge bpr -5- appendix petitioner's exhibits exhibit p1 the true copy of the mri scan report dated 29.01.2021. exhibit p2 the true copy of the possession notice dated 04.12.2021. exhibit p3 the true copy of the representation dated 22.12.2021 given to the 1st respondent.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 16TH POUSHA, 1943 PETITIONERS: MANIKANDAN, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.SIVADASAN ACHARI, RESIDING AT PUTHUVAL PUTHAN VEEDU, PAMPURA, KALLUVATHUKKAL P.O., KOLLAM-691 578. BY ADVS. S.SREEKUMAR (KOLLAM) K.VIJAYAN RESPONDENTS: 1 THE MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA, ATTINGAL BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 102. 2 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, BANK OF BARODA, ATTINGAL BRANCH, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 102. ADV.R.REMA, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of January, 2022

JUDGMENT

Petitioner as borrower from the respondent-Bank, has committed default in repayment. Consequently, proceedings have been initiated by the Bank for recovery of the amounts due.

2. During the course of the hearing, petitioner has confined the relief to an opportunity for repaying the overdue amount in instalments and to obtain regularisation of the loan account.

3. It was submitted on behalf of the respondent-Bank

that the petitioner committed default in repayment and the overdue amount is Rs.6,00,000/-. It was further submitted that though proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as a matter of indulgence, the respondent Bank is willing to accept repayment of the overdue amount in limited instalments and regularise the loan account.

4. I have heard Adv.Sreekumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Adv.R. Rema, learned Standing Counsel -3- for the respondents.

5. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the

situation now prevailing, apart from the submissions made as recorded above, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the overdue amount in '6' instalments and thereafter, if the amount so directed is repaid within the time as directed above, to have the loan account regularised.

6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

respondent-Bank to accept repayment of the entire overdue amount of Rs.6,00,000/- along with bank charges from the petitioner and to regularise the loan account of the petitioner on the following conditions:

(i) The overdue amount of Rs.6,00,000/- shall be repaid in '6' equated monthly instalments.

(ii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 31.01.2022.

(iii) Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI’s along with the instalments directed above.

(iv) In the event of any default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with law.

(v) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the

-4- entire amounts, all coercive proceedings against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE bpr -5- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MRI SCAN REPORT DATED 29.01.2021. EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 04.12.2021. EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22.12.2021 GIVEN TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial