Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajan E.K. vs T. K. Jayaraj

Rajan E.K. vs T. K. Jayaraj

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 23, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1440121

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/13/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajan E.K.

Respondent

T. K. Jayaraj

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran wednesday, the 23rd day of march 2022 / 2nd chaithra, 1944 against the judgment in wp(c) 7414/2021 of high court of kerala petitioner/petitioner in wpc.no.7414/2021: rajan e.k. aged 58 years residing at edapattunjalil, kurumulloor p. o., vedagiri, ettumanoor, kottayam district. by advs. r.lakshmi narayan r.ranjanie respondents/respondents 2 and 3 in wpc.no.7414/2021:1 t. k. jayaraj age and father's name not known to the petitioner, the managing director, kerala state textile corporation ltd., head office of the kerala state textile corporation ltd., annapoorna, kochar road, sasthamangalam, thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. 2 aby thomas age and father's name not known to the petitioner, the general manager, kottayam textiles, (a government of kerala undertaking), vedagiri, kurumalloor p. o., kanakkary (via), kottayam district - 686 639. by adv p.u.shailajanthis contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 23.03.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentwhen this matter was called today, sri.p.u.shailajan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, submitted that the directions in the judgment have been complied with and the eligible amounts remitted into the employees' provident fund account of the petitioner. recording the afore submissions and leaving liberty to the petitioner to seek any further clarification that they may require, i close this contempt case. sd/- devan ramachandran judgerp appendix of con.case(c) 13/2022 petitioner annexures annexure a1 the certified copy of the judgment dated 29.07.2021 in wp(c) no.7414 of 2021.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1944 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 7414/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC.NO.7414/2021: RAJAN E.K. AGED 58 YEARS RESIDING AT EDAPATTUNJALIL, KURUMULLOOR P. O., VEDAGIRI, ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN R.RANJANIE RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 IN WPC.NO.7414/2021:

1 T. K. JAYARAJ AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD., HEAD OFFICE OF THE KERALA STATE TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD., ANNAPOORNA, KOCHAR ROAD, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 2 ABY THOMAS AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE GENERAL MANAGER, KOTTAYAM TEXTILES, (A GOVERNMENT OF KERALA UNDERTAKING), VEDAGIRI, KURUMALLOOR P. O., KANAKKARY (VIA), KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 639. BY ADV P.U.SHAILAJAN

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

When this matter was called today, Sri.P.U.Shailajan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent, submitted that the directions in the judgment have been complied with and the eligible amounts remitted into the Employees' Provident Fund Account of the petitioner. Recording the afore submissions and leaving liberty to the petitioner to seek any further clarification that they may require, I close this Contempt Case. SD/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE

rp APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 13/2022 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 29.07.2021 IN WP(C) NO.7414 OF 2021.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial