Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramalingam vs Sarath Kumar

Ramalingam vs Sarath Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 28, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1439893

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/17996/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramalingam

Respondent

Sarath Kumar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 28-04-2026coramthe hon'ble mrs.justice r. kalaimathi in ramalingam s/o. manjini, no.118, ramar koil street, sonankuppam, cuddalore ot, cuddalore taluk. .. petitioner vs.1. sarath kumar s/o. kanagaraj, no.15/7, ellaiyammal koil street, anumathaikuppam village and post, thindivanama taluk2. velu s/o. mohan, 148, sedankuttai street, tindivanam taluk3. divisional manager united india insurance company ltd, no.13a, nethaji road, cuddalore-607 001. .. respondentsprayer : this civil miscellaneous petition is filed under section 173(1) of motor vehicles act, 1988, to condone the delay of 304 days in filing the above appeal . for petitioner (s) : ms.ramya v.rao for r3 : mr.j.chandranorderheard the learned counsel for the petitioner. page1 of 2r.kalaimathi, j.kkd2. ms.janani would submit that mr.j.chandran, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat for r3/insurance company and she has got objections in allowing the application.3. the petitioner would aver that due to financial constrains, delay of 304 days in preferring the civil miscellaneous appeal.4. accepting the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of thispetition, this petition is allowed subject to the condition that the interest for the delay period of 229 days shall stand waived. 28-04-2026 kkd to the motor accident claims tribunal, special sub court, cuddalore. in page2 of 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-04-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI in Ramalingam S/o. Manjini, No.118, Ramar Koil street, Sonankuppam, Cuddalore OT, Cuddalore Taluk. .. Petitioner Vs.

1. Sarath Kumar S/o. Kanagaraj, No.15/7, Ellaiyammal Koil Street, Anumathaikuppam Village and post, Thindivanama Taluk

2. Velu S/o. Mohan, 148, Sedankuttai Street, Tindivanam Taluk

3. Divisional Manager united India Insurance Company Ltd, No.13A, Nethaji Road, Cuddalore-607 001. .. Respondents

Prayer : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to condone the delay of 304 days in filing the above appeal . For Petitioner (s) : Ms.Ramya V.Rao For R3 : Mr.J.Chandran

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Page1 of 2

R.KALAIMATHI, J.

KKD

2. Ms.Janani would submit that Mr.J.Chandran, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalat for R3/Insurance Company and she has got objections in allowing the application.

3. The petitioner would aver that due to financial constrains, delay of 304 days in preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

4. Accepting the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this

petition, this petition is allowed subject to the condition that the interest for the delay period of 229 days shall stand waived. 28-04-2026 KKD To The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub Court, Cuddalore. in Page2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial