Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.K. Krishnakumar vs the Chief Engineer

P.K. Krishnakumar vs The Chief Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 14, 2022
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1439550

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
AR/36/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.K. Krishnakumar

Respondent

The Chief Engineer

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran friday, the 14th day of january 2022 / 24th pousha, 1943 ar no. 36 of 2018 petitioner: p.k. krishnakumar, s/o.late c.k.nair, aged 69 years, managing partner, m/s.pn enterprises, xxii/267a, vaisakh, university post, thrikkakara, kochi-682022, ernakulam district.by adv sri.s.murali respondents: 1 the chief engineer (nw), naval base, kochi-682004. 2 the commander works engineers (nw) military engineer services, naval base p.o., kochi-682004. 3 garrison engineer 1 navy, lakshadweep. 4 garrison engineer fort kochi, kochi-682001. by adv sri.k.r.rajkumar - c.g.c. this arbitration request having come up for admission on 14.01.2022, the court on the same day passed the following:o r d e rwhen this matter was called today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that his client is no more. in the afore circumstances, i close this arbitration request, however, leaving full liberty to the legal heirs of the petitioner to seek a rehearing after impleading themselves, if they are so interested, in future. sd/- rr devan ramachandran judge appendix petitioner exhibits annexure a1 true photocopy of the contractagreement ca no cwe(nw) kochi/390f 2012-13 provision of two lattice mast for naval detachment at androth island lakshaweep with military engineer services with general conditions of contractsannexure a2 true photocopy of the communication no.pne/volt3/110 dated 21.04.2017 (pages 1 to 2) made by the petitioner to the 1st respondent seeking appointment of the arbitrator annexure a3 true photocopy of the communication dated 28.04.2017 made by the petitioner to the 1st respondent seeking appointment of the arbitrator and settlement of accounts annexure a4 true photocopy of the claim submitted by the petitioner to the 1st respondent dated 28.04.2017

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 24TH POUSHA, 1943 AR NO. 36 OF 2018 PETITIONER: P.K. KRISHNAKUMAR, S/O.LATE C.K.NAIR, AGED 69 YEARS, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.PN ENTERPRISES, XXII/267A, VAISAKH, UNIVERSITY POST, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-682022, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV SRI.S.MURALI RESPONDENTS: 1 THE CHIEF ENGINEER (NW), NAVAL BASE, KOCHI-682004. 2 THE COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEERS (NW) MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, NAVAL BASE P.O., KOCHI-682004. 3 GARRISON ENGINEER 1 NAVY, LAKSHADWEEP. 4 GARRISON ENGINEER FORT KOCHI, KOCHI-682001. BY ADV SRI.K.R.RAJKUMAR - C.G.C. THIS ARBITRATION REQUEST HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

When this matter was called today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that his client is no more. In the afore circumstances, I close this Arbitration Request, however, leaving full liberty to the legal heirs of the petitioner to seek a rehearing after impleading themselves, if they are so interested, in future. Sd/- RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER EXHIBITS ANNEXURE A1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CONTRACT

AGREEMENT CA NO CWE(NW) KOCHI/390F 2012-13 PROVISION OF TWO LATTICE MAST FOR NAVAL DETACHMENT AT ANDROTH ISLAND LAKSHAWEEP WITH MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES WITH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONTRACTS

ANNEXURE A2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.PNE/VOLT3/110 DATED 21.04.2017 (PAGES 1 TO 2) MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT SEEKING APPOINTMENT OF THE ARBITRATOR ANNEXURE A3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 28.04.2017 MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT SEEKING APPOINTMENT OF THE ARBITRATOR AND SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNTS ANNEXURE A4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE CLAIM SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28.04.2017

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial