Prasanth vs Sunil

Prasanth vs SUNIL

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 30, 2022

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1439527

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1439527
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias
Decided On: May 30, 2022
Case Number: MACA/15/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prasanth

Respondent

SUNIL

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias monday, the 30th day of may 2022 / 9th jyaishta, 1944 against the order/judgment in opmv 225/2016 of motor accident claims tribunal , irinjalakuda appellant/s: prasanth, aged 24 years s/o.bharatha rajan,nelliyil house,panagattiri desom and p.o,elavanchery village,kollamkode via, palakkad district. by adv v.binoy ram respondent/s: 1 sunil, s/o balan,kaiparambil house,kuttichira desom and p.o,thrissur district,pin-680724. 2 sinesh, s/o.mani,nandhikarakkaran house, ulumbathukunnu desom,nellayi village and p.o,thrissur district,pin-680305. 3 the manager, oriental insurance co.ltd,branch office,city heights building,1st floor,south junction,chalakudy,pin-680307. by advs. sri.p.l.devadas sri.s.k.ajay kumar this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 30.05.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submit that the subject matter in dispute between the parties in the appeal has been settled between them as per the joint memo of settlement dated 26.04.2022 executed by the parties and counter signed by the respective counsel.2. i have perused the joint memo of settlement executed bythe parties and find the same to be in accordance with law. in the result, the appeal is allowed as per the conditions in the joint memo of settlement dated 26.04.2022, which shall form part of the judgment. sd/- c.s.dias judge rkc/30.05.22

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 9TH JYAISHTA, 1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 225/2016 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL , IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT/S: PRASANTH, AGED 24 YEARS S/O.BHARATHA RAJAN,NELLIYIL HOUSE,PANAGATTIRI DESOM AND P.O,ELAVANCHERY VILLAGE,KOLLAMKODE VIA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV V.BINOY RAM RESPONDENT/S: 1 SUNIL, S/O BALAN,KAIPARAMBIL HOUSE,KUTTICHIRA DESOM AND P.O,THRISSUR DISTRICT,PIN-680724. 2 SINESH, S/O.MANI,NANDHIKARAKKARAN HOUSE, ULUMBATHUKUNNU DESOM,NELLAYI VILLAGE AND P.O,THRISSUR DISTRICT,PIN-680305. 3 THE MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD,BRANCH OFFICE,CITY HEIGHTS BUILDING,1ST FLOOR,SOUTH JUNCTION,CHALAKUDY,PIN-680307. BY ADVS. SRI.P.L.DEVADAS SRI.S.K.AJAY KUMAR THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submit that the subject matter in dispute between the parties in the appeal has been settled between them as per the joint memo of settlement dated 26.04.2022 executed by the parties and counter signed by the respective counsel.

2. I have perused the joint memo of settlement executed by

the parties and find the same to be in accordance with law. In the result, the appeal is allowed as per the conditions in the joint memo of settlement dated 26.04.2022, which shall form part of the judgment. Sd/- C.S.DIAS JUDGE rkc/30.05.22

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2022 Same Parties Prasanth vs SUNIL Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C.S.Dias