Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Mohammedkutty Vs THE SECRETARY

Mohammedkutty vs The Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 29, 2023
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1439510

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/44266/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohammedkutty

Respondent

The Secretary

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c. jayachandran friday, the 29th day of december 2023 / 8th pousha, 1945 wp(c) no. 44266 of 2023 petitioner: mohammedkutty aged 62 years s/o. moideenkutty, residing at nalakath kalathil (h),, chelambra p.o., malappuram district, pin - 673631by advs. g.hariharan k.s.smitha praveen.h. b.r.sindu v.r.sanjeev kumar respondents: 1 the secretary regional transport authority, malappuram district, pin - 676505 2 regional transport authority malappuram district r epresented by its secretary., pin - 676505 by smt.deepa v government pleader this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 29.12.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..2..j u d g m e n tdated this the 29th day of december, 2023 the short grievance of the petitioner is that ext.p3 and p4 applications for issuance of regular permit, as also, temporary permit have not been considered by the competent authority among the respondents.2. having heard the learned counsel appearing forthe petitioner and the learned government pleader, this court directs the 2nd respondent to consider ext.p3 representation and the 1st respondent to consider ext.p4 representation in accordance with law. ext.p4 shall be disposed of within a period of one month, and ext.p3, within a period of two months. this writ petition stands disposed of as above. sd/- c. jayachandran judge mtk//23.12.2023 ..3.. appendix of wp(c) 44266/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 a true copy of the regular stage carriage permit dated 20.07.2011 issued by the 1st respondent relating to bus no. kl-55a- exhibit p2 a true copy of the request dated 11.07.2016 submitted by the petitioner before the 1st respondent for renewal of exhibit.p1 permit exhibit p3 a true copy of the application forrenewal of the permit dated 10.04.2023 submitted by the petitioner before the 1st respondent for renewal of permit exhibit p4 a true copy of the application for the issuance of 4 mo

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 8TH POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 44266 OF 2023 PETITIONER: MOHAMMEDKUTTY AGED 62 YEARS S/O. MOIDEENKUTTY, RESIDING AT NALAKATH KALATHIL (H),, CHELAMBRA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 673631

BY ADVS. G.HARIHARAN K.S.SMITHA PRAVEEN.H. B.R.SINDU V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR RESPONDENTS: 1 THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676505 2 REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MALAPPURAM DISTRICT R EPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY., PIN - 676505 BY SMT.DEEPA V GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..2..

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 29th day of December, 2023 The short grievance of the petitioner is that Ext.P3 and P4 applications for issuance of regular permit, as also, temporary permit have not been considered by the competent authority among the respondents.

2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for

the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P3 representation and the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4 representation in accordance with law. Ext.P4 shall be disposed of within a period of one month, and Ext.P3, within a period of two months. This writ petition stands disposed of as above. Sd/- C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE mtk//23.12.2023 ..3.. APPENDIX OF WP(C) 44266/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR STAGE CARRIAGE PERMIT DATED 20.07.2011 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT RELATING TO BUS NO. KL-55A- Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 11.07.2016 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR RENEWAL OF EXHIBIT.P1 PERMIT Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR

RENEWAL OF THE PERMIT DATED 10.04.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR RENEWAL OF PERMIT Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF 4 MONTHS TEMPORARY PERMIT DATED 10.04.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2023 Same Parties Mohammedkutty vs The Secretary Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice C. Jayachandran

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales