Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shaina Pacha vs Lbs Centre for Science & Technology

Shaina Pacha vs Lbs Centre for Science & Technology

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 21, 2023
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1438934

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/43006/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shaina Pacha

Respondent

Lbs Centre for Science & Technology

Excerpt

.....kurian thomas, j.----------------------------------------- w.p.(c) no.43006 of 2023 ---------------------------------------- dated this the 21st day of december, 2023judgmentthe limited prayer now sought for by the petitioner is for a direction to consider ext.p1 complaint filed by the petitioner in a time-bound manner. according to the petitioner, in the seniority list prepared, he had certain grievances, and despite a hearing note submitted as ext.p5, no orders have been passed thereon.2. having heard sri.s.sabarinadh, the learned counsel forthe petitioner, as well as smt. shameena salaludheen, the learned standing counsel for the respondents, i am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction.3. accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1 strespondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on ext.p1 complaint, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment.sd/- bechu kurian thomas judge ajm appendix of wp(c) 43006/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1:- a true photocopy of the complaint dated 31.10.2023 submitted by the petitioner with the 1st respondent, via proper channel exhibit p2:- a true photocopy of the officeorder no. b2/3813/2013 dated03.11.2023 issued by the 1st respondent pursuant to the receipt of exhibit p1 exhibit p3:- a true photocopy of the communication no. b2/3813/2013 dated 03.11.2023 issued on behalf of the 1st respondent to the petitioner exhibit p4:- a true photocopy of the hearing notice no. b2/3813/2013 dated 14.11.2023 issued on behalf of the 1st respondent to the petitioner exhibit p5:- a true photocopy of the hearing note dated 21.11.2023 prepared and submitted by the petitioner before the 2nd respondent

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 PETITIONER: SHAINA PACHA AGED 52 YEARS RESIDING AT AKSHAYA, CHOVVA S.O., KANNUR; WHO IS PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, LBS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, KASARAGOD, PIN - 670006 BY ADVS. S.SABARINADH INDULEKHA JOSEPH RESPONDENTS: 1 LBS CENTRE FOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY NANDAVANAM P.O. PALAYAM, BY ITS DIRECTOR, PIN - 695033 2 GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE (CONSTITUTED BY VIRTUE OF ORDER NO. B2/3813/2013 DATED 03.11.2023), LBS CENTRE FOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, NANDAVANAM P.O. PALYAM, BY ITS MEMBERS., PIN - 695033 OTHER PRESENT: SR.GP.PREMCHAND R.NAIR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.43006 of 2023 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of December, 2023

JUDGMENT

The limited prayer now sought for by the petitioner is for a direction to consider Ext.P1 complaint filed by the petitioner in a time-bound manner. According to the petitioner, in the seniority list prepared, he had certain grievances, and despite a hearing note submitted as Ext.P5, no orders have been passed thereon.

2. Having heard Sri.S.Sabarinadh, the learned counsel for

the petitioner, as well as Smt. Shameena Salaludheen, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction.

3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1 st

respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 complaint, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment.

Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE AJM APPENDIX OF WP(C) 43006/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1:- A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 31.10.2023 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER WITH THE 1ST RESPONDENT, VIA PROPER CHANNEL Exhibit P2:- A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE OFFICE

ORDER NO. B2/3813/2013 DATED

03.11.2023 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT PURSUANT TO THE RECEIPT OF EXHIBIT P1 Exhibit P3:- A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO. B2/3813/2013 DATED 03.11.2023 ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P4:- A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE HEARING NOTICE NO. B2/3813/2013 DATED 14.11.2023 ISSUED ON BEHALF OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P5:- A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE HEARING NOTE DATED 21.11.2023 PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial