PAVITHRA Vs C.Arulananthu

Pavithra vs C.Arulananthu

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 29, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1438496

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1438496
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mrs.Justice R. Kalaimathi
Decided On: Apr 29, 2026
Case Number: CMP/17017/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pavithra

Respondent

C.Arulananthu

Excerpt

this civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 972 days in filing the above appeal.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.3. the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent has no serious objection to allowing the application.4. the petitioner would aver that, due to the death of her husband in a roadtraffic accident that took place on 01.07.2022, she had to take care of her minor daughters and meet the day-to-day expenses of the family. she would further aver that, owing to financial constraints, a delay of 972 days has occurred in preferring the civil miscellaneous appeal.5. accepting the averments made by the petitioner in the affidavit enclosedwith the petition, this court is inclined to allow this civil miscellaneous petition subject to the condition that the interest for the delay period of 972 days alone shall stand waived. accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is ordered. nvi page no.1 / 2 nvi page no.2 / 2

Full Judgment

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 972 days in filing the above appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.

3. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent has no serious objection to allowing the application.

4. The petitioner would aver that, due to the death of her husband in a road

traffic accident that took place on 01.07.2022, she had to take care of her minor daughters and meet the day-to-day expenses of the family. She would further aver that, owing to financial constraints, a delay of 972 days has occurred in preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

5. Accepting the averments made by the petitioner in the affidavit enclosed

with the petition, this Court is inclined to allow this Civil Miscellaneous Petition subject to the condition that the interest for the delay period of 972 days alone shall stand waived. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. nvi Page No.1 / 2 nvi Page No.2 / 2

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Pavithra vs C.Arulananthu Same Judge Honourable Mrs.Justice R. Kalaimathi