Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

RAJA Vs The State Rep by

RAJA vs The State Rep by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Apr 30, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1438415

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL MP/7951/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RAJA

Respondent

The State Rep by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 30.04.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice g.k.ilanthiraiyan 1.raja 2.sarathkumar ... petitioners vs. the state rep. by the inspector of police, (crime no.380 of 2025) ... respondent prayer: criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed under section 528 of bnss, 2023, praying to relax the condition 7(b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police twice a day at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m., until further orders. for petitioners : mr.c.deepak kumar for respondent : mr.p.dhileepan, government advocate (crl.side)g.k.ilanthiraiyan, j.orderthis application has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in crl.o.p.no.4830 of 2026 on 06.03.2026, to report before the respondent police twice a day at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m., until further orders.2. the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioners are complying with the conditions regularly.3. considering the said submission, the condition imposed as against the petitioners is totally relaxed. however, the petitioners are directed to report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. 30.04.2026 cda to 1.the inspector of police, 2.the public prosecutor, high court, madras.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.04.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN 1.Raja 2.Sarathkumar ... Petitioners Vs. The State rep. By The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.380 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying to relax the condition 7(b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police twice a day at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m., until further orders. For Petitioners : Mr.C.Deepak Kumar For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

ORDER

This application has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.No.4830 of 2026 on 06.03.2026, to report before the respondent police twice a day at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m., until further orders.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioners are complying with the conditions regularly.

3. Considering the said submission, the condition imposed as against the petitioners is totally relaxed. However, the petitioners are directed to report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation. 30.04.2026 cda To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial