Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A. Rajesh vs State Rep.by

A. Rajesh vs State Rep.by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided May 06, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1436643

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/11518/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A. Rajesh

Respondent

State Rep.by

Excerpt

.....opposed for grant of bail on the ground that the petitioner earlier moved bail application before the lower court and the same was dismissed and this is the second bail application before this court and the case is pending trial. 5.considering the facts and circumstances and considering the period of incarceration, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on certain page2 of 5 conditions.6. accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, onexecuting a bond for a sum of rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned additional sessions judge, krishnagiri, and on further conditions that,(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their aadhar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation, until further orders;(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness;(d) the petitioner shall not abscond during trial;(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned magistrate/trialcourt is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the page3 of 5 petitioner released on bail by the learned magistrate/trial court himself as laid down by the hon'ble supreme court in p.k.shaji vs. state of kerala [(2005)air scw 5560]. f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh fir can be registered under section 269 of bns. 06-05-2026 index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no mtl to1. the state rep.by the inspector of police, hosur town police station, krishnagiri district. (crime no. 558 of 2021)2. the additional sessions court, krishnagiri.3. the superintendent, central prison, salem. page4 of 5l.victoria.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06-05-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI A. Rajesh S/o. Anandan, No.1/155, Chinna Mettarai, Haleseepam, VTC Ayaranapalli, Krishnagiri. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.By The Inspector of Police, Hosur Town Police Station, Krishnagiri District. (Crime No. 558 of 2021) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 483 of BNSS Act, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending Trial in S.C. No. 236 of 2022 on the file of the Additional Session Court, Krishnagiri. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Panneer Selvan For Respondent(s): Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate (Crl Side)

ORDER

The petitioner/Accused No.1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 341, 397, 201 of IPC/ 103(1), 126(2), 311, 238 of BNSS Act, 2023 in Crime No.558 Page1 of 5 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The allegation against the petitioner is that he was involved in a case of murder. The case has been taken on file in SC No.236 of 2022 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri. On 29.10.2024, the petitioner did not appear before the Court and therefore, a non-bailable warrant (NBW) was issued. Subsequently, the petitioner was arrested by the respondent police and produced before the trial court on 18.10.2025. Hence, the Petition.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an

innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, he has been arrested and he is languishing in jail from 18.10.2025. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) appearing for the

respondent police opposed for grant of bail on the ground that the petitioner earlier moved bail application before the lower Court and the same was dismissed and this is the second bail application before this Court and the case is pending trial. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances and considering the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner on certain Page2 of 5 conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri, and on further conditions that,

(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation, until further orders;

(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness;

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond during trial;

(e) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial

Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Page3 of 5 petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. f) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS. 06-05-2026 Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No MTL To

1. The State Rep.By The Inspector of Police, Hosur Town Police Station, Krishnagiri District. (Crime No. 558 of 2021)

2. The Additional Sessions Court, Krishnagiri.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem. Page4 of 5

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.

MTL 06-05-2026 Page5 of 5

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial