Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

R.Jayalakshmi vs the Superintendent

R.Jayalakshmi vs The Superintendent

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1436437

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/12414/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R.Jayalakshmi

Respondent

The Superintendent

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 30.03.2026coramthe honourable mr.justice m.dhandapani and r.jayalakshmi ... petitioner vs. tirupur district - 638 111. ... respondentsprayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in letter no.8695/na.aa./2026, dated 16.03.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to get signature in the forms supplied by the 2nd respondent from mr.k.rajkumar, remand prisoner with prisoner identification no.726415.for petitioner : mr.p.kannan kumar for respondents : mr.v.meganathan for r1 government advocateorderthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this court to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach authority and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. 2.in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. pri index: yes/ no speaking order: yes/ no ncc: yes/ no to tirupur district - 638 111.m.dhandapani,j.pri and

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.03.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And R.Jayalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. Tirupur District - 638 111. ... Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in letter No.8695/Na.Aa./2026, dated 16.03.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to get signature in the forms supplied by the 2nd respondent from Mr.K.Rajkumar, remand prisoner with Prisoner Identification No.726415.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kannan Kumar For Respondents : Mr.V.Meganathan for R1 Government Advocate

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach authority and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To Tirupur District - 638 111.

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

pri And

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial